Head-to-Head: UmiJS vs VitePress Analysis


v4.0.83(13 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 12Monthly npm downloads

Umi is a highly extensible and customizable front-end development framework for building modern web applications. It is built on top of React and provides a set of conventions and best practices to streamline the development process. Umi offers a plugin-based architecture, allowing developers to easily add functionality and customize the build process.

Alternatives: create-react-app, Next.js, Gatsby

Tags: javascriptframeworkreactfront-endextensible


v1.0.0-rc.20(10 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 12Monthly npm downloads

VitePress is a modern static site generator powered by the Vue 3 framework. With VitePress, developers can create high-performance documentation, landing pages, blogs, and other static sites leveraging Vue's reactive data-binding and composition API. It offers seamless integration with Vue, allowing developers to use Vue components in their pages and markdown files, making the templating system highly flexible and customizable.

Alternatives: Nuxt.js, Gatsby, Next.js

Tags: static-site-generatorvuedocumentationbloglanding-pages



Both Umi and Vitepress are popular npm packages in the JavaScript community. Umi is widely used for building enterprise-level React applications and has a large user base. Vitepress, on the other hand, is gaining popularity as a lightweight static site generator specifically designed for Vue.js projects.

Framework Support

Umi is a comprehensive front-end framework that supports multiple frameworks including React, Vue, Angular, Preact, and more. It provides extensive features such as routing, build optimization, plugins, and more. Vitepress, on the other hand, is focused solely on Vue.js projects and provides a minimalist and efficient development environment for building static sites.


When it comes to performance, Vitepress has an advantage. Vitepress leverages Vite, a build tool that offers native ES module support and blazing fast hot-reload. It provides near-instantaneous compilation and updates, resulting in faster development iterations. Umi also offers good performance, but it may not be as fast as Vitepress for development purposes.

Developer Experience

Umi provides a more extensive development experience with a wide range of features including a plugin system, automatic routing, built-in SSR support, and more. It is well-documented and has an active community which makes it easy for developers to find resources and support. Vitepress, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a minimal setup and configuration, making it a great choice for small to medium-sized projects or documentation sites.

Build and Deployment

Umi provides a built-in build system and supports various deployment options like static deployment, server-side rendering (SSR), and more. It offers flexibility in terms of how projects are built and deployed. Vitepress, on the other hand, is designed to generate static sites, which can be easily deployed to any static hosting provider. It simplifies the build and deployment process by generating optimized static files that can be served from a CDN.

Community and Ecosystem

Umi has a mature and active community, with a wide range of plugins and extensions that can be used to enhance development productivity. It also has a larger ecosystem due to its multi-framework support. Vitepress, while relatively newer, is backed by the Vue.js ecosystem and benefits from a growing community and ecosystem.