Head-to-Head: Sugar vs Underscore Analysis

sugar

v2.0.6(over 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Sugar is a comprehensive JavaScript utility library that provides additional methods for working with arrays, dates, functions, numbers, objects, and strings. It enhances the native JavaScript objects with useful functionalities like date manipulation, string formatting, array iteration, and object cloning. Sugar aims to simplify common programming tasks and improve code readability by offering a more expressive and concise syntax.

Alternatives:
lodash+
underscore+
ramda+
immutable+
mori+
seamless-immutable+
immer+
baobab+
collect.js+
lazy.js+

Tags: javascriptutilitylibraryarraysdatesstrings

underscore

v1.13.6(almost 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/underscoreNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Underscore is a utility library for JavaScript that provides a wide range of functions to manipulate and work with arrays, objects, functions, and other data types. It offers functional programming helpers, such as map, reduce, filter, and more, making it easier to perform common operations on data structures. Underscore also includes utilities for handling asynchronous operations, templating, and functional composition.

Alternatives:
lodash+
ramda+
immutable+
mout+
lazy.js+
collect.js+
baconjs+
sugar+
functional.js+
dashify+

Tags: javascriptutilityfunctional-programmingdata-manipulationlibrary

Fight!

Popularity

Underscore is a widely popular and well-established library that has been around for a long time. It has a large community and is widely used in many projects. Sugar, on the other hand, is less popular and has a smaller community compared to Underscore.

Size

Underscore is a lightweight library with a small file size, making it suitable for projects where minimizing bundle size is a priority. Sugar, on the other hand, has a larger file size due to its extensive feature set and additional functionalities.

Functionality

Both libraries provide a wide range of utility functions and helper methods. Underscore focuses on providing functional programming utilities, while Sugar aims to enhance JavaScript's native objects and provide additional convenience methods. Sugar offers more extensive functionality compared to Underscore.

Flexibility

Underscore is a standalone library that can be used in both browser and server-side environments. It has minimal dependencies and can be easily integrated into any project. Sugar, on the other hand, extends JavaScript's native objects, which can introduce potential conflicts and compatibility issues in certain scenarios.

Documentation

Underscore has comprehensive and well-documented API documentation, making it easy for developers to understand and use its features. Sugar also has decent documentation, but it may not be as extensive or organized as Underscore's documentation.

Maintenance

Both libraries are actively maintained by their respective communities. However, Underscore has a longer history and a larger community, which ensures ongoing maintenance and updates. Sugar may have a smaller community and may not receive updates or bug fixes as frequently as Underscore.