Head-to-Head: Sugar vs Underscore Analysis

sugar

v2.0.6(almost 6 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Sugar is a comprehensive JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for working with arrays, objects, dates, strings, and more. It enhances the native JavaScript objects with additional methods, making common tasks like date manipulation, string formatting, and array iteration more convenient and expressive. Sugar's chaining syntax allows for fluent and readable code, improving developer productivity and code maintainability.

Alternatives:
lodash+
underscore+
ramda+
rambda+
date-fns+
moment+
dayjs+
date-and-time+
js-joda+
timeago.js+

Tags: javascriptutilitylibraryarraydatestring

underscore

v1.13.7(3 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/underscoreNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Underscore is a utility library for JavaScript that provides a wide range of functions to manipulate arrays, objects, functions, and other data types. It offers a functional programming style with functions like map, filter, reduce, and more, making it easier to work with data in a concise and efficient manner. Underscore also includes utility functions for common tasks like object iteration, type checking, and function binding.

Alternatives:
lodash+
ramda+
rambda+
lazy.js+
mout+
collect.js+
fxts+
baconjs+
folktale+
prelude-ls+

Tags: javascriptutilityfunctional-programmingdata-manipulationlegacy

Fight!

Popularity

Underscore is a widely popular and well-established library that has been around for a long time. It has a large community and is widely used in many projects. Sugar, on the other hand, is less popular and has a smaller community compared to Underscore.

Size

Underscore is a lightweight library with a small file size, making it suitable for projects where minimizing bundle size is a priority. Sugar, on the other hand, has a larger file size due to its extensive feature set and additional functionalities.

Functionality

Both libraries provide a wide range of utility functions and helper methods. Underscore focuses on providing functional programming utilities, while Sugar aims to enhance JavaScript's native objects and provide additional convenience methods. Sugar offers more extensive functionality compared to Underscore.

Flexibility

Underscore is a standalone library that can be used in both browser and server-side environments. It has minimal dependencies and can be easily integrated into any project. Sugar, on the other hand, extends JavaScript's native objects, which can introduce potential conflicts and compatibility issues in certain scenarios.

Documentation

Underscore has comprehensive and well-documented API documentation, making it easy for developers to understand and use its features. Sugar also has decent documentation, but it may not be as extensive or organized as Underscore's documentation.

Maintenance

Both libraries are actively maintained by their respective communities. However, Underscore has a longer history and a larger community, which ensures ongoing maintenance and updates. Sugar may have a smaller community and may not receive updates or bug fixes as frequently as Underscore.