Head-to-Head: Sapper vs UmiJS Analysis

sapper

v0.29.3(over 2 years ago)

This package is deprecated: SvelteKit is the successor to Sapper - https://kit.svelte.dev/The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 6Monthly npm downloads

Sapper is a framework for building server-rendered web applications with Svelte. It provides a powerful combination of Svelte's reactive components and server-side rendering capabilities, resulting in fast and SEO-friendly web applications. Sapper simplifies the development process by handling routing, code-splitting, and server-side rendering out of the box.

Alternatives:
sveltekit+
next.js+
nuxt+
gatsby+
blitz+
remix+
astro+
vite+
quasar+
redwoodjs+

Tags: frameworkserver-renderingwebSvelterouting

umi

v4.2.11(3 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 12Monthly npm downloads

Umi is a comprehensive front-end development framework that streamlines the creation of React applications. It offers a plugin-based architecture, allowing developers to extend and customize their projects easily. Umi provides features like routing, state management, and build optimization out of the box, reducing the need for manual configuration. Its convention over configuration approach simplifies project setup and maintenance.

Alternatives:
next.js+
nuxt.js+
create-react-app+
gatsby+
blitz+
remix+
vite+
sapper+
redwoodjs+
quasar+

Tags: javascriptframeworkreactfront-endplugin-based

Fight!

Popularity

Both Sapper and Umi are popular choices in the JavaScript community. Sapper is a framework built on top of Svelte, which has a smaller but dedicated community. Umi, on the other hand, is a framework built on top of React and has a larger and more established community.

Scalability

Both Sapper and Umi are scalable frameworks that can handle large-scale applications. Sapper is known for its efficient server-side rendering capabilities, which makes it a good choice for SEO-friendly applications. Umi provides a plugin-based architecture that allows for easy extensibility and scalability.

Performance

Sapper, being built on Svelte, is known for its excellent performance. It compiles components to highly optimized JavaScript code, resulting in fast and efficient applications. Umi, being built on React, also provides good performance, but it may not be as lightweight as Sapper.

Developer Experience

Sapper offers a simple and intuitive development experience with its file-based routing system and built-in server-side rendering support. It has a smaller learning curve compared to Umi. Umi, on the other hand, provides a more feature-rich development experience with its plugin system, extensive configuration options, and support for various front-end technologies.

Community and Ecosystem

Umi has a larger and more active community, which means there are more resources, tutorials, and plugins available. It also has better integration with the React ecosystem and supports popular tools like Redux and TypeScript. Sapper, although smaller, has a dedicated community and a growing ecosystem around Svelte.

Documentation

Both Sapper and Umi have well-documented websites with comprehensive guides and examples. Umi's documentation is more extensive and covers a wider range of topics due to its larger community and ecosystem.