Head-to-Head: Roarr vs Winston Analysis

roarr

v7.21.0(23 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Roarr is a lightweight and efficient logging library for Node.js and browsers. It provides a simple and flexible API for logging structured messages with customizable log levels, timestamps, and context information. Roarr supports various output formats, including JSON and plain text, and allows you to easily integrate with existing logging systems.

Alternatives: winston, bunyan, pino

Tags: javascriptloggingnode.jsbrowserstructured-logging

winston

v3.11.0(2 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 11Monthly npm downloads

Winston is a versatile and widely used logging library for Node.js applications. It provides a simple and flexible API for logging messages to various transports, such as the console, files, databases, and external services. Winston supports different log levels, allowing you to filter and control the verbosity of your logs.

Alternatives: pino, bunyan, log4js

Tags: node.jslogginglogtransportslog levels

Fight!

Popularity

Winston is one of the most popular logging libraries in the Node.js ecosystem with a large user base and active community. It has been around for a longer time and is widely adopted by many projects. On the other hand, Roarr is a relatively newer library and may not have the same level of popularity as Winston.

Features and Flexibility

Winston provides a wide range of features and logging transports out of the box, making it highly flexible and customizable. It supports various logging levels, custom formatting options, and multiple transports like Console, File, Database, etc. Roarr takes a different approach and focuses on structured logging, providing a JSON-centric logging format. It offers a minimalistic and lightweight API. While Roarr may have fewer features compared to Winston, its focus on structured logging may be beneficial in certain use cases.

Performance

Both Winston and Roarr are performant libraries. However, performance can depend on specific use cases and configurations. Winston is known for its performance optimizations and can handle high log volumes efficiently. Roarr, being a lightweight library, generally performs well in terms of speed and memory usage. However, the performance difference between these libraries may not be significant for most use cases.

Integration and Community Support

Winston has wide integration with various frameworks, libraries, and tools. It has a large community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find resources and support. Roarr, while it may have fewer integrations and community support compared to Winston, still has an active community and sufficient documentation for typical use cases.

Developer Experience

Winston provides a comprehensive and well-documented API. It has good TypeScript support with type definitions available. Roarr also provides a simple and intuitive API with TypeScript support. However, the ecosystem and community support for Winston may make it more straightforward for developers who prefer a more established solution.

Maintenance

Both Winston and Roarr are actively maintained projects. Winston has a large community and a longer history, which signals its stability and continued support. Roarr, being a newer library, may still be evolving and may have less documentation or community resources, but it is actively maintained by its developers.