Alternatives: lodash, underscore, ramda
Remeda is a relatively new library, but it has gained popularity and has a growing community. Sugar, on the other hand, has been around for a longer time and has a well-established user base.
Remeda is a smaller library and has a smaller file size compared to Sugar. This can be beneficial if you're concerned about the size of your application or if you're targeting performance optimizations.
Both libraries provide a range of utility functions, but the scope of their functionality differs. Remeda focuses on providing functional programming utilities, while Sugar offers a broader set of features, including additional data manipulation, date manipulation, and string manipulation functions.
Remeda follows a more functional programming approach and provides a clean and concise API that is consistent and easy to use. Sugar, on the other hand, follows a more object-oriented design pattern and provides a rich API with multiple layers of chaining and options.
Both libraries have documentation available, but Sugar's documentation is more extensive and detailed, covering a wider range of topics and providing examples for different use cases. Remeda's documentation is also well-maintained, but it may require some additional exploration to find specific information.
Both libraries are actively maintained by their respective communities. Remeda has a smaller community but demonstrates active development and bug fixes. Sugar has a larger community and a longer history, which ensures a more stable and well-tested codebase.