Head-to-Head: Pino vs Signale Analysis

pino

v9.2.0(10 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 11Monthly npm downloads

Pino is a fast and lightweight logging library for Node.js applications. It is designed for high performance and low overhead, making it suitable for production environments where logging can impact performance. Pino offers structured logging capabilities, allowing you to log JSON objects efficiently. It supports various log levels, serializers, and transports, making it highly customizable and adaptable to different logging needs.

Alternatives:
winston+
bunyan+
log4js+
morgan+
winston-daily-rotate-file+
roarr+
consola+
signale+
debug+
loglevel+

Tags: node.jsloggingperformancestructured-loggingJSON

signale

v1.4.0(over 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/signaleNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Signale is a highly configurable and easy-to-use logging library for Node.js and browsers. It offers a variety of log levels, colors, and symbols to customize and enhance the logging output. Signale provides a clean and structured way to log messages, making it suitable for both simple and complex logging needs. It supports logging to the console, files, or any writable stream.

Alternatives:
winston+
pino+
log4js+
bunyan+
consola+
debug+
morgan+
winston-daily-rotate-file+
roarr+
loglevel+

Tags: loggingNode.jsbrowserconfigurablelog levels

Fight!

Popularity

Both Pino and Signale are popular logging libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem. Pino is known for its high performance and has gained popularity for its low overhead and scalability. Signale, on the other hand, is popular for its elegant and customizable logging output.

Performance

Pino is designed to be extremely fast and lightweight, making it suitable for high-performance applications. It has been benchmarked as one of the fastest logging libraries available. Signale, while not as performant as Pino, still provides good performance and is suitable for most use cases.

Features

Pino focuses on providing a minimalistic and efficient logging solution. It offers essential features like log levels, serializers, and log formatters. Signale, on the other hand, provides a more feature-rich logging experience with additional features like colors, symbols, and support for custom loggers and destinations.

Configuration

Pino offers a simple and straightforward configuration process. It provides a flexible API for customization and allows easy integration with other tools and frameworks. Signale also offers configuration options but is more opinionated in terms of its logging output and formatting.

Developer Experience

Both Pino and Signale provide good developer experiences. Pino has a well-documented API and offers TypeScript support out of the box. Signale also has good documentation and provides a user-friendly and intuitive API. The choice between the two may come down to personal preference and the specific needs of the project.

Community Support

Both Pino and Signale have active communities and receive regular updates and bug fixes. Pino has a larger community and is widely adopted in the Node.js ecosystem. Signale, while not as widely used, still has a dedicated user base and active maintainers.