Head-to-Head: Pino vs Roarr Analysis

pino

v8.20.0(9 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 11Monthly npm downloads

Pino is a fast and low-overhead Node.js logger designed for performance and efficiency. It offers a simple and easy-to-use API for logging messages with customizable levels and formats. Pino is known for its high throughput and low latency, making it suitable for high-performance applications and microservices. It supports features like log rotation, log levels, and log filtering.

Alternatives:
winston+
bunyan+
log4js+
morgan+
winston-daily-rotate-file+
roarr+
consola+
signale+
debug+
loglevel+

Tags: node.jsloggerperformanceefficiencylogging

roarr

v7.21.1(about 1 month ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Roarr is a lightweight and efficient logging library for Node.js and browsers. It focuses on providing structured and JSON-based logging output, making it easier to analyze and process logs programmatically. Roarr supports log levels, custom contexts, and log message formatting, allowing developers to customize their logging experience. It also offers a simple and intuitive API for logging messages with different levels of severity.

Alternatives:
pino+
winston+
bunyan+
log4js+
morgan+
debug+
consola+
signale+
winston-daily-rotate-file+
loglevel+

Tags: loggingNode.jsbrowserstructured-loggingJSON

Fight!

Popularity

Pino is a widely used and popular logging library in the Node.js ecosystem. It is known for its performance and scalability. Roarr, on the other hand, is a newer and less popular package compared to Pino.

Performance

Pino is highly optimized for performance and is one of the fastest logging libraries available for Node.js. It uses a stream-based approach to minimize overhead. Roarr, while performant, might not have the same level of optimization and scalability as Pino.

Features

Pino provides a comprehensive set of features for logging, including log levels, JSON formatting, log levels customization, and log filtering. Roarr also offers similar features but might have a slightly different approach or set of functionalities.

Developer Experience

Both Pino and Roarr have well-documented APIs and good community support. Pino has a larger user base and active community, which means you may find more resources and examples available. Roarr, being a newer package, might have a smaller community but could still provide adequate support.

Integration

Pino is widely adopted and integrates well with various frameworks and tools in the Node.js ecosystem. It has integrations with popular frameworks like Express and Fastify and can be easily extended. Roarr might have fewer integrations available due to its lower popularity, but it still can be integrated into most Node.js applications.

Maintenance

Pino is actively maintained and regularly updated to address issues and add new features. Roarr might have fewer updates and may not receive maintenance as frequently. Choosing Pino can provide a more reliable and well-maintained logging solution in the long run.