Head-to-Head: Pino vs Roarr Analysis


v8.15.4(about 20 hours ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 11Monthly npm downloads

Pino is a fast and low-overhead logging library for Node.js applications. It is designed to be extremely efficient and performant, making it ideal for high-throughput and production-grade logging. Pino supports various log levels, including trace, debug, info, warn, error, and fatal, allowing you to easily categorize and filter log messages based on their severity.

Alternatives: winston, bunyan, log4js

Tags: node.jsloggingperformancelog-levelsjson-format


v7.15.1(2 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 6Monthly npm downloads

Roarr is a lightweight and efficient logging library for Node.js and browsers. It provides a simple and flexible API for logging structured messages with customizable log levels, timestamps, and context information. Roarr supports various output formats, including JSON and plain text, and allows you to easily integrate with existing logging systems.

Alternatives: winston, bunyan, pino

Tags: javascriptloggingnode.jsbrowserstructured-logging



Pino is a widely used and popular logging library in the Node.js ecosystem. It is known for its performance and scalability. Roarr, on the other hand, is a newer and less popular package compared to Pino.


Pino is highly optimized for performance and is one of the fastest logging libraries available for Node.js. It uses a stream-based approach to minimize overhead. Roarr, while performant, might not have the same level of optimization and scalability as Pino.


Pino provides a comprehensive set of features for logging, including log levels, JSON formatting, log levels customization, and log filtering. Roarr also offers similar features but might have a slightly different approach or set of functionalities.

Developer Experience

Both Pino and Roarr have well-documented APIs and good community support. Pino has a larger user base and active community, which means you may find more resources and examples available. Roarr, being a newer package, might have a smaller community but could still provide adequate support.


Pino is widely adopted and integrates well with various frameworks and tools in the Node.js ecosystem. It has integrations with popular frameworks like Express and Fastify and can be easily extended. Roarr might have fewer integrations available due to its lower popularity, but it still can be integrated into most Node.js applications.


Pino is actively maintained and regularly updated to address issues and add new features. Roarr might have fewer updates and may not receive maintenance as frequently. Choosing Pino can provide a more reliable and well-maintained logging solution in the long run.