Head-to-Head: ow vs Runtypes Analysis

ow

v2.0.0(about 1 month ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 6Monthly npm downloads

OW is a flexible and composable validation library for JavaScript and TypeScript. It allows developers to define validation rules for various data types and structures, enabling robust input validation in applications. OW provides a fluent API for creating validation schemas with support for chaining multiple validation rules, custom error messages, and complex data structures.

Alternatives:
joi+
yup+
ajv+
superstruct+
zod+
prop-types+
class-validator+
validator+
io-ts+
typescript-is+

Tags: javascripttypescriptvalidationdata-validationfluent-api

runtypes

v6.7.0(about 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Runtypes is a library for runtime type checking in JavaScript. It allows you to define and validate complex data types at runtime, ensuring that your data conforms to the specified structure. Runtypes provides a simple and expressive syntax for defining types, making it easy to create robust validation logic for your applications.

Alternatives:
io-ts+
zod+
yup+
ajv+
joi+
class-validator+
superstruct+
prop-types+
tcomb+
typescript-json-schema+

Tags: javascripttype-checkingvalidationdata-typesruntime

Fight!

Popularity

Both ow and runtypes are popular libraries for runtime type checking in JavaScript. Ow has been around for longer and has a solid user base, while runtypes has gained popularity for its powerful features and ease of use.

Features

Ow focuses on providing a simple and expressive API for type validation, with support for custom predicates and chaining methods. Runtypes, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive solution with support for complex type definitions, type inference, and runtime type guards.

Performance

In terms of performance, ow is known for its lightweight and fast validation, making it suitable for projects where performance is a critical factor. Runtypes, while powerful, may introduce some overhead due to its more extensive feature set.

Developer Experience

Both libraries offer good developer experiences, but ow is praised for its simplicity and ease of integration into existing projects. Runtypes, on the other hand, provides more advanced features that can be beneficial for projects requiring complex type validations.

Community Support

Both ow and runtypes have active communities and are regularly maintained. Ow has a larger user base due to its longevity, while runtypes is gaining popularity for its modern approach to type checking.