Head-to-Head: Nightmare vs Puppeteer Analysis

nightmare

v3.0.2(about 5 years ago)

This package is deprecated. Consider finding alternatives.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/nightmareNumber of direct dependencies: 14Monthly npm downloads

Nightmare is a high-level browser automation library for Node.js, built on top of Electron. It allows developers to automate interactions with web pages, such as clicking elements, filling forms, and scraping data. Nightmare provides a simple API for creating and running browser automation scripts, making it ideal for tasks like web scraping, testing, and UI automation.

Alternatives:
puppeteer+
playwright+
cypress+
webdriverio+
testcafe+
selenium-webdriver+
taiko+
casperjs+
zombie+
phantom+

Tags: node.jsbrowser automationweb scrapingtestingUI automation

puppeteer

v22.11.0(2 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 4Monthly npm downloads

Puppeteer is a Node.js library that provides a high-level API for controlling headless Chrome or Chromium browsers. It allows developers to automate tasks such as web scraping, testing, and generating screenshots of web pages. Puppeteer offers a rich set of features, including the ability to interact with web pages, simulate user actions, and capture network traffic.

Alternatives:
playwright+
selenium-webdriver+
webdriverio+
nightwatch+
cypress+
testcafe+
taiko+
puppeteer-core+
puppeteer-extra+
puppeteer-cluster+

Tags: node.jsweb automationheadless browserweb scrapingtesting

Fight!

Popularity

Puppeteer is more popular and widely used compared to Nightmare. Puppeteer is maintained by the Chrome team and has gained a lot of popularity due to its powerful features and extensive documentation.

Functionality

Both Nightmare and Puppeteer are headless browser automation libraries, but Puppeteer provides a more comprehensive set of features and APIs. Puppeteer has better support for modern web technologies and offers more advanced capabilities such as PDF generation, tracing, and network interception.

Ease of Use

Puppeteer has a more user-friendly and intuitive API, making it easier for developers to get started. Nightmare, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and may require more effort to understand and use effectively.

Performance

Puppeteer is known for its excellent performance and speed. It leverages the Chrome DevTools Protocol and provides a high level of control over the browser. Nightmare, while still performant, may not be as optimized as Puppeteer in terms of speed and resource usage.

Community and Support

Puppeteer has a larger and more active community compared to Nightmare. It has extensive documentation, a dedicated website, and a strong presence on platforms like GitHub and Stack Overflow. This means that finding help, examples, and resources for Puppeteer is generally easier.

Browser Compatibility

Both libraries support multiple browsers, but Puppeteer is primarily focused on Chrome and Chromium-based browsers. Nightmare, on the other hand, supports multiple browsers including Electron, Chrome, and Firefox. If cross-browser compatibility is a priority, Nightmare might be a better choice.