Head-to-Head: Mout vs Ramda Analysis

mout

v1.2.4(almost 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Mout is a collection of modular utilities for JavaScript projects, providing a set of helper functions for common programming tasks. It offers a wide range of functions for working with arrays, objects, functions, strings, and more, making it easier to handle various data manipulation operations.

Alternatives:
lodash+
underscore+
ramda+
functional.js+
collect.js+
101+
lazy.js+
folktale+
immutable+
sugar+

Tags: javascriptutilitiesmodulardata-manipulationhelper-functions

ramda

v0.30.1(18 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/ramdaNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Ramda is a functional programming library for JavaScript that emphasizes immutability and side-effect-free functions. It provides a set of utility functions that enable functional programming paradigms like currying, composition, and partial application. Ramda's functions are designed to be easily composable, allowing developers to create complex transformations by chaining simple functions together.

Alternatives:
lodash+
underscore+
immutable+
mori+
seamless-immutable+
immer+
collect.js+
baconjs+
lazy.js+
fp-ts+

Tags: javascriptfunctional-programmingimmutableutilitycomposition

Fight!

Popularity

Both Mout and Ramda are popular npm packages and have a decent following in the JavaScript community. However, Ramda has gained more popularity in recent years, thanks to its functional programming paradigm and immutable data handling capabilities.

Size

In terms of size, Mout is a smaller library compared to Ramda. Mout focuses on providing utility functions for common tasks, whereas Ramda provides a more extensive set of functional programming utilities.

Functional Programming

Ramda is specifically designed for functional programming and provides a wide range of functions that support functional programming patterns such as immutability, currying, and composition. Mout, on the other hand, is not limited to functional programming and provides general-purpose utility functions.

Modularity

Mout follows a modular approach where its functionalities are available as individual modules. This allows developers to include only the specific modules they need, reducing bundle size. Ramda is also modular, but its modules are more tightly integrated, and it encourages using the entire library for better optimization.

Documentation

Both Mout and Ramda provide good documentation, with examples and detailed explanations for each function. However, Ramda's documentation is more comprehensive and organized, making it easier for developers to get started and explore the library.

Usability

Mout provides a more traditional utility function approach, similar to other utility libraries like Lodash or Underscore. It has a simpler learning curve and can be easily integrated into existing projects. Ramda, due to its functional programming paradigm, may require a shift in thinking for developers who are not familiar with functional programming concepts.

Performance

In terms of performance, Mout is known for its optimized code and performs well. Ramda, being more focused on functional programming, may have a slight performance overhead due to its emphasis on immutability and data transformations. However, the performance difference is usually negligible and depends on the specific use case.