Head-to-Head: MobX vs Redux Analysis

mobx

v6.12.3(29 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

MobX is a simple, scalable state management library for JavaScript applications. It enables you to create reactive data models that automatically update when the underlying data changes. MobX follows a more direct and transparent approach compared to other state management solutions like Redux, reducing boilerplate code and making it easier to work with complex data structures.

Alternatives:
redux+
vuex+
zustand+
recoil+
easy-peasy+
valtio+
effector+
jotai+
xstate+
akita+

Tags: javascriptstate-managementreactive-programmingdata-modelsscalable

redux

v5.0.1(4 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Redux is a predictable state container for JavaScript apps, commonly used with libraries like React or Angular for managing application state. It provides a centralized store to manage the entire state of an application, making it easier to track changes and maintain consistency across components. Redux follows a unidirectional data flow pattern, enhancing predictability and ease of debugging.

Alternatives:
mobx+
zustand+
recoil+
effector+
easy-peasy+
valtio+
jotai+
redux-toolkit+
rematch+
fluxible+

Tags: javascriptstate-managementpredictable-state-containerunidirectional-data-flow

Fight!

Popularity

Both MobX and Redux are popular state management libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem. Redux has been around for longer and has a larger user base and ecosystem. However, MobX has gained popularity for its simplicity and ease of use.

Architecture

Redux is based on the Flux architecture pattern and follows a strict unidirectional data flow. It separates the application state and logic into actions and reducers. MobX, on the other hand, is based on the Observable pattern and allows for more flexible and reactive state management. It automatically tracks state dependencies and updates components accordingly.

Developer Experience

Redux has a more explicit and structured API, which can be helpful for larger and complex applications. It enforces certain patterns and provides middleware for handling async actions. MobX, on the other hand, has a simpler and more intuitive API that allows for more concise code and reduces boilerplate. It provides a more reactive programming experience.

Learning Curve

Redux has a steeper learning curve compared to MobX due to its specific patterns and concepts like actions, reducers, and immutability. MobX, on the other hand, has a shorter learning curve as it embraces mutable state and fewer concepts.

Performance

Redux promotes immutability and pure functions, which can help with performance optimizations like memoization and time-travel debugging. However, the overhead of middleware and immutability can impact performance in certain scenarios. MobX, on the other hand, leverages reactivity and updates only the necessary components when state changes, which can result in better performance for certain use cases.

Community and Ecosystem

Redux has a larger community and ecosystem with a wide range of middleware, dev tools, and community extensions. It has become a standard choice for state management in many JavaScript frameworks. MobX has a smaller but growing community with a decent ecosystem and integrations.