SolidJS is known for its small bundle size and efficient rendering algorithm. It is designed to be lightweight and optimized for performance. Mithril is also lightweight but may have a slightly larger bundle size compared to SolidJS.
SolidJS is known for its exceptional performance. It utilizes a fine-grained reactive system that minimizes unnecessary re-renders and provides efficient updates. Mithril also performs well but may not have the same level of optimization as SolidJS.
Mithril provides a simple and intuitive API that is easy to learn and use. It has a minimalistic approach and offers features like routing and XHR utilities out of the box. SolidJS follows a similar philosophy of simplicity and provides a declarative API. It also offers features like fine-grained reactivity and JSX support. Both libraries have good documentation and active communities.
Both Mithril and SolidJS are suitable for small to medium-sized applications. However, SolidJS's fine-grained reactivity system and efficient rendering algorithm make it particularly well-suited for large-scale applications with complex UIs. Mithril is also scalable but may require additional optimizations for very large applications.
Ecosystem and Community
Mithril has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and extensions available. It has been around for a longer time, which means there are more resources and community support available. SolidJS, being a newer library, has a smaller ecosystem but is growing rapidly. It has an active community and is backed by the SolidJS organization.