Head-to-Head: Mithril.js vs Solid Analysis

mithril

v2.2.2(almost 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/mithrilNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Mithril is a lightweight JavaScript framework for building single-page applications (SPAs). It focuses on simplicity, performance, and size, making it an ideal choice for projects that require a small footprint. Mithril provides a virtual DOM implementation, allowing efficient updates to the UI without sacrificing performance.

Alternatives:
preact+
vue+
svelte+
inferno+
react+
alpinejs+
hyperapp+
solid-js+
lit+
riot+

Tags: javascriptframeworksingle-page-applicationvirtual-domperformance

solid-js

v1.8.15(16 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Solid is a declarative JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It is inspired by React and offers a similar component-based architecture. Solid focuses on performance and efficiency, using fine-grained reactivity to update only the necessary parts of the UI.

Alternatives:
preact+
vue+
svelte+
react+
inferno+
alpinejs+
mithril+
hyperapp+
lit+
riot+

Tags: javascriptlibraryuser-interfacereactivityperformance

Fight!

Popularity

Mithril has been around for a longer time and has a more established presence in the JavaScript community. It has a dedicated user base and is widely used in production applications. SolidJS, on the other hand, is a relatively newer library but has been gaining popularity due to its unique approach and performance benefits.

Size

SolidJS is known for its small bundle size and efficient rendering algorithm. It is designed to be lightweight and optimized for performance. Mithril is also lightweight but may have a slightly larger bundle size compared to SolidJS.

Performance

SolidJS is known for its exceptional performance. It utilizes a fine-grained reactive system that minimizes unnecessary re-renders and provides efficient updates. Mithril also performs well but may not have the same level of optimization as SolidJS.

Developer Experience

Mithril provides a simple and intuitive API that is easy to learn and use. It has a minimalistic approach and offers features like routing and XHR utilities out of the box. SolidJS follows a similar philosophy of simplicity and provides a declarative API. It also offers features like fine-grained reactivity and JSX support. Both libraries have good documentation and active communities.

Scalability

Both Mithril and SolidJS are suitable for small to medium-sized applications. However, SolidJS's fine-grained reactivity system and efficient rendering algorithm make it particularly well-suited for large-scale applications with complex UIs. Mithril is also scalable but may require additional optimizations for very large applications.

Ecosystem and Community

Mithril has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and extensions available. It has been around for a longer time, which means there are more resources and community support available. SolidJS, being a newer library, has a smaller ecosystem but is growing rapidly. It has an active community and is backed by the SolidJS organization.