Head-to-Head: Mithril.js vs Preact Analysis

mithril

v2.2.8(17 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/mithrilNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Mithril is a modern client-side JavaScript framework for building single-page applications. It is known for its small size (8kb gzip) and high performance, making it a great choice for lightweight applications where speed and efficiency are crucial. Mithril follows a minimalist design philosophy, providing a simple and elegant API for creating components, managing state, and handling routing.

Alternatives:
preact+
inferno+
vue+
svelte+
react+
hyperapp+
riot+
solid-js+
lit+
alpinejs+

Tags: javascriptframeworksingle-page-applicationlightweighthigh-performance

preact

v10.24.3(8 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Preact is a fast and lightweight alternative to React, offering a similar API and functionality while being smaller in size. It provides a Virtual DOM implementation, component-based architecture, and state management capabilities, making it suitable for building efficient and performant web applications. Preact is actively maintained and optimized for speed and memory usage, making it a popular choice for projects where a smaller footprint is desired.

Alternatives:
react+
inferno+
vue+
svelte+
solid-js+
lit+
alpinejs+
mithril+
hyperapp+
riot+

Tags: javascriptlibraryvirtual-domcomponent-basedperformance

Fight!

Popularity

Preact has gained popularity in recent years and has a growing community, but Mithril has been around for longer and has a more established user base. Both packages are well-known in the JavaScript community, but React (not mentioned in the request) is the most popular and widely used framework.

Size

Preact is a lightweight alternative to React and is known for its small size. It is significantly smaller than Mithril and React, making it a good choice for projects where bundle size is a concern. Mithril, while smaller than React, is still larger than Preact.

Compatibility

Preact is designed to be compatible with the React API, which means that most React components can be used with Preact without any modifications. Mithril, on the other hand, has its own API and requires some adjustments when migrating from React.

Performance

Both Preact and Mithril are known for their excellent performance. Preact is optimized for speed and memory usage, while Mithril is also lightweight and performs well. However, due to its smaller size, Preact generally has a slight edge in terms of performance.

Developer Experience

Preact provides a similar developer experience to React, with a familiar API and tooling ecosystem. Mithril has its own unique API, which may require a learning curve for developers who are already familiar with React. However, both libraries have good documentation and active communities.

Ecosystem and Community

React has the largest ecosystem and community among the three libraries. It has a vast number of third-party libraries, tools, and resources available. Preact has a growing ecosystem and community, with many React libraries being compatible with Preact. Mithril has a smaller ecosystem and community compared to React and Preact.