Head-to-Head: MaterializeCSS vs Windi CSS Analysis
v1.0.0(about 5 years ago)
Windi CSS is a modern utility-first CSS framework that provides classes for designing pages quickly. It offers an intuitive syntax with over 250 built-in utilities for colors, typography, spacing, and more. The framework has a small footprint and can work independently or alongside other CSS frameworks.
Materialize CSS has been around for a longer time and has a larger user base compared to WindiCSS. It is a popular front-end framework inspired by Material Design. WindiCSS is a relatively newer library that has gained popularity for its utility-first CSS approach.
Materialize CSS is a feature-rich library and has a larger file size compared to WindiCSS. WindiCSS, on the other hand, focuses on generating lean and optimized CSS styles, resulting in smaller file sizes.
Materialize CSS provides a pre-defined set of CSS styles and components following the Material Design guidelines. It offers ready-to-use components and a more opinionated approach. WindiCSS, on the other hand, is a utility-first CSS framework that provides a collection of utility classes to build custom styles quickly.
Materialize CSS provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to modify the library's styles and themes based on their needs. WindiCSS, on the other hand, promotes a more flexible and customizable approach by using utility classes that can be easily composed and customized.
Materialize CSS has extensive documentation and a large community, making it relatively easy to find resources, tutorials, and support. WindiCSS also provides good documentation but being a relatively newer library, it may have a smaller community and fewer resources available.
WindiCSS is known for its excellent performance due to its utility-first CSS approach. It eliminates unused styles during the build process, resulting in smaller CSS file sizes and faster loading times. Materialize CSS, being a more feature-rich library, may have a slightly higher performance overhead.