Head-to-Head: MaterializeCSS vs Semantic UI Analysis

materialize-css

v1.0.0(over 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/materialize-cssNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Materialize CSS is a modern and responsive front-end framework based on Google's Material Design guidelines. It provides a comprehensive set of CSS and JavaScript components that make it easy to create visually appealing and interactive web applications. With Materialize CSS, you can quickly build responsive layouts, navigation bars, forms, buttons, cards, and much more.

Alternatives:
material-ui+
@mui/material+
react-materialize+
material-components-web+
materialize+
vue-material+
vuetify+
mdbootstrap+
quasar+
material-components-web-react+

Tags: cssframeworkresponsivematerial-designfront-end

semantic-ui

v2.5.0(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/semantic-uiNumber of direct dependencies: 33Monthly npm downloads

Semantic UI is a popular front-end development framework that provides a comprehensive set of ready-to-use UI components. It focuses on creating intuitive and responsive user interfaces with a clean and modern design. Semantic UI follows a semantic naming convention, making it easy to understand and use the components.

Alternatives:
fomantic-ui+
ant-design+
material-ui+
bootstrap+
bulma+
tailwindcss+
foundation-sites+
chakra-ui+
tachyons+
primer+

Tags: javascriptfront-enduicomponentsresponsive

Fight!

Popularity

Both Materialize CSS and Semantic UI are popular front-end frameworks. Materialize CSS has gained significant popularity due to its modern design and ease of use. Semantic UI, on the other hand, has a strong following and is known for its semantic and intuitive class names.

Design and Customization

Materialize CSS follows Google's Material Design guidelines and provides a clean and modern design out of the box. It offers extensive theming options and allows for easy customization. Semantic UI emphasizes a sleek and modern design with intuitive class names that provide semantic meaning to elements. It also provides theming support and allows for customization, although it may require more effort compared to Materialize CSS.

Component Library

Both frameworks provide a comprehensive set of UI components. Materialize CSS offers a wide range of ready-to-use components, including navigation bars, cards, modals, and more. Semantic UI also offers a rich collection of components, leveraging intuitive class names. Both frameworks provide responsive components that work well on different screen sizes.

Documentation and Learning Curve

Materialize CSS has thorough and well-structured documentation, making it easy to get started and learn the framework. It provides examples and detailed explanations of each component. Semantic UI also has extensive documentation with clear examples and usage guidelines. However, some users find the learning curve of Semantic UI to be slightly steeper due to the semantic class naming convention.

Community and Ecosystem

Materialize CSS has a large and active community, which means you can find plenty of resources, tutorials, and community-driven plugins and extensions. Semantic UI also has a dedicated community and offers a range of community-built themes and extensions. Both frameworks have good community support, but Materialize CSS may have a slightly larger ecosystem.

Performance

In terms of performance, Materialize CSS is known to be relatively lightweight and performs well. It provides optimized CSS and JS code, making it efficient. Semantic UI is also performant, but some users have noted that it can be slightly heavier due to its comprehensive component library and class naming conventions.