Head-to-Head: Material Design Lite vs MaterializeCSS Analysis

material-design-lite

v1.3.0(over 7 years ago)

This package is deprecated. Consider finding alternatives.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/material-design-liteNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Material Design Lite (MDL) is a front-end framework developed by Google that allows developers to easily implement Google's Material Design principles in web projects. It provides a set of CSS, HTML, and JavaScript components for creating modern and responsive user interfaces with a clean and consistent design. MDL offers components like buttons, cards, menus, and sliders, following the Material Design guidelines for layout, color, and typography.

Alternatives:
material-components-web+
rmwc+
materialize-css+
react-md+
vue-material+
material-ui+
vuetify+
angular-material+
quasar+
mdbootstrap+

Tags: front-endframeworkmaterial-designresponsiveGoogle

materialize-css

v1.0.0(almost 6 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/materialize-cssNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Materialize CSS is a modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design principles. It provides a clean and intuitive user interface design with ready-to-use components like buttons, forms, cards, and navigation elements. Materialize CSS offers a grid system for easy layout structuring and responsive design, making it suitable for building mobile-first websites and web applications.

Alternatives:
material-ui+
vuetify+
quasar+
bootstrap-material-design+
mdbootstrap+
react-toolbox+
material-components-web+
materialize+
material-design-lite+
propeller+

Tags: cssframeworkresponsivematerial-designcomponents

Fight!

Popularity

Materialize CSS is more popular and widely used compared to Material Design Lite. Materialize CSS has a larger community and more resources available, including community-driven plugins and themes.

Size

Material Design Lite is relatively smaller in size compared to Materialize CSS. Material Design Lite follows a more minimalist approach and offers a lighter footprint, making it suitable for projects with stricter performance requirements.

Flexibility

Materialize CSS provides a more comprehensive set of components, utilities, and features out of the box. It offers a wider range of customization options and gives developers more flexibility in terms of design and interactions. Material Design Lite, while lighter, is more opinionated and may require additional custom code for specific use cases.

Browser Support

Both libraries support modern browsers, but Material Design Lite explicitly focuses on supporting older browsers, including Internet Explorer 10 and 11, while Materialize CSS primarily targets newer browser versions. If cross-browser compatibility is a priority, Material Design Lite might be a better choice.

Documentation and Community Support

Materialize CSS has more extensive documentation with detailed examples and a larger community support base. It also provides official themes, guides, and community-driven resources like plugins and extensions. Material Design Lite documentation, while sufficient, is not as extensive or actively maintained.

Customizability

Both libraries offer CSS customization options, but Materialize CSS provides a more straightforward and user-friendly way to customize the design. It offers Sass support, a wide range of prebuilt themes, and customization options through CSS variables. Material Design Lite, on the other hand, requires more manual customization and less tooling support.