Head-to-Head: Marko vs Mithril.js Analysis

marko

v5.35.5(about 16 hours ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 14Monthly npm downloads

Marko is a fast and lightweight JavaScript UI library for building web applications with a focus on server-side rendering. It offers a component-based architecture that allows developers to create reusable and encapsulated UI components. Marko provides efficient server-side rendering, resulting in faster page loads and improved SEO performance.

Alternatives:
pug+
handlebars+
ejs+
mustache+
nunjucks+
hbs+
dustjs-linkedin+
doT+
twig+
squirrelly+

Tags: javascriptUI libraryserver-side renderingcomponent-basedperformance optimization

mithril

v2.2.2(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/mithrilNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Mithril is a modern client-side JavaScript framework for building single-page applications. It is known for its small size (only 8kb gzipped) and high performance, making it a great choice for lightweight applications where speed and efficiency are crucial. Mithril follows a minimalist design philosophy, providing a simple and elegant API for creating components, managing state, and handling routing.

Alternatives:
preact+
vue+
react+
svelte+
inferno+
alpinejs+
solid-js+
hyperapp+
lit+
riot+

Tags: javascriptframeworksingle-page-applicationlightweighthigh-performance

Fight!

Popularity

Mithril has been around for longer and has gained a moderate level of popularity in the JavaScript community. Marko, on the other hand, is a relatively newer library and has a smaller user base compared to Mithril.

Size

Mithril is a lightweight library with a small footprint, making it suitable for projects where size is a concern. Marko, on the other hand, has a larger code base and may require additional dependencies, which can increase the overall bundle size.

Scalability

Both Marko and Mithril are designed to be scalable and performant. However, Marko is specifically optimized for server-side rendering (SSR) and is known for its excellent performance in rendering large-scale applications. Mithril also performs well but may require additional optimizations for handling large-scale applications.

Developer Experience

Mithril provides a simple and intuitive API, making it easy to learn and use. It has a minimalistic approach and provides features like routing, XHR requests, and virtual DOM. Marko, on the other hand, has a more opinionated approach and provides a component-based architecture with a focus on server-side rendering. It also offers features like hot-reloading and a powerful template engine.

Community and Ecosystem

Mithril has a larger and more active community compared to Marko. It has a wide range of community-contributed plugins, tools, and integrations available. Marko, being a newer library, has a smaller community and ecosystem, but it is growing steadily.

Documentation

Both Marko and Mithril have well-documented APIs and provide comprehensive guides and examples. However, Mithril's documentation is more extensive and has a larger number of community-contributed resources available.