Head-to-Head: Lodash vs Sugar Analysis

lodash

v4.17.21(almost 4 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/lodashNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Lodash is a widely-used JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of helper functions for simplifying common programming tasks. It offers functions for manipulating arrays, objects, strings, and more, making it easier to work with complex data structures and perform operations like filtering, mapping, and reducing data. Lodash is known for its consistency, performance, and extensive documentation, making it a go-to choice for many developers.

Alternatives:
underscore+
ramda+
rambda+
lazy.js+
mout+
deepdash+
collect.js+
fxts+
baconjs+
folktale+

Tags: javascriptutilitylibrarydata manipulationprogramming tasks

sugar

v2.0.6(almost 6 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Sugar is a comprehensive JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for working with arrays, objects, dates, strings, and more. It enhances the native JavaScript objects with additional methods, making common tasks like date manipulation, string formatting, and array iteration more convenient and expressive. Sugar's chaining syntax allows for fluent and readable code, improving developer productivity and code maintainability.

Alternatives:
lodash+
underscore+
ramda+
rambda+
date-fns+
moment+
dayjs+
date-and-time+
js-joda+
timeago.js+

Tags: javascriptutilitylibraryarraydatestring

Fight!

Popularity

Lodash is one of the most popular utility libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem, with a large and active community. Sugar, on the other hand, is less popular and has a smaller user base.

Size

Lodash is a comprehensive utility library with a wide range of functions, which makes it larger in size compared to Sugar. Sugar, on the other hand, is a smaller library that focuses on providing additional functionality and syntactic sugar for JavaScript objects and arrays.

Functionality

Both libraries provide a similar set of utility functions for working with arrays, objects, strings, and other common data types. Lodash has a more extensive collection of functions and covers a wider range of use cases. Sugar, on the other hand, provides additional features like enhanced date handling, chaining, and extended syntax for working with JavaScript objects and arrays.

Performance

Lodash is known for its optimized and performant implementations of utility functions. It has been widely used and battle-tested in various projects. Sugar also focuses on performance and provides optimized implementations, but it may not be as extensively optimized as Lodash.

Developer Experience

Lodash has a well-documented API with clear examples and a large community that provides support and resources. It also has TypeScript support and provides type definitions. Sugar also has documentation, but it may not be as extensive or widely used as Lodash. It may have a smaller community and fewer resources available.

Maintenance

Both libraries are actively maintained, but Lodash has a larger and more active community, which ensures regular updates, bug fixes, and improvements. Sugar may have a smaller maintenance team and may not receive updates or bug fixes as frequently as Lodash.