Head-to-Head: Lodash vs Ramda Analysis

lodash

v4.17.21(about 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/lodashNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Lodash is a widely-used JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of helper functions for simplifying common programming tasks. It offers functions for manipulating arrays, objects, strings, and more, making it easier to work with complex data structures and perform operations like filtering, mapping, and reducing data. Lodash is known for its consistency, performance, and extensive documentation, making it a go-to choice for many developers.

Alternatives:
underscore+
ramda+
immutable+
immer+
collect.js+
mori+
baconjs+
lazy.js+
seamless-immutable+
functional.js+

Tags: javascriptutilitylibrarydata manipulationfunctional programming

ramda

v0.29.1(7 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/ramdaNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Ramda is a functional programming library for JavaScript that emphasizes immutability and side-effect-free functions. It provides a set of utility functions that enable functional programming paradigms like currying, composition, and partial application. Ramda's functions are designed to be easily composable, allowing developers to create complex transformations by chaining simple functions together.

Alternatives:
lodash+
underscore+
immutable+
mori+
seamless-immutable+
immer+
lazy.js+
baconjs+
folktale+
functional.js+

Tags: javascriptfunctional-programmingimmutableutilitycomposition

Fight!

Popularity

Both Lodash and Ramda are popular JavaScript utility libraries, but Lodash has been around longer and has a larger user base and community support. Lodash is widely adopted in many projects and has a higher level of popularity overall.

Size

When it comes to size, Ramda is more lightweight than Lodash. Ramda promotes a functional programming style and provides a more modular approach, allowing you to import only the specific functions you need. Lodash, on the other hand, has a larger code base and offers more features and functionalities, resulting in a larger bundle size.

Functional Programming

Ramda is designed with a strong focus on functional programming concepts, providing a set of functions that work well with immutable data and support function composition. It emphasizes immutability and offers a more declarative and functional approach. Lodash, while it also provides functional programming capabilities, is more geared towards imperative programming with mutable data and has a larger variety of utility functions.

Performance

In terms of performance, Lodash generally performs better in benchmarks compared to Ramda. Lodash is highly optimized, and its imperative style and mutable operations can provide faster execution in certain scenarios. Ramda, being more focused on functional programming, emphasizes immutability and can have a performance impact in certain use cases.

API Design

Lodash follows a more traditional, imperative-style and object-oriented API design. Its functions accept the data as the first argument and provide a wide range of utility functions to work with arrays, objects, and other data types. Ramda, on the other hand, follows a more functional programming approach with a 'curry-last' style API, where functions are curried by default.

Community and Documentation

Both Lodash and Ramda have active communities and are well-documented. Lodash has a larger community and more resources available, including a comprehensive documentation with examples and a robust ecosystem. Ramda also has good documentation, but its community and ecosystem are relatively smaller compared to Lodash.