Head-to-Head: Lodash vs Rambda Analysis

lodash

v4.17.21(over 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/lodashNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Lodash is a widely-used JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of helper functions for simplifying common programming tasks. It offers functions for manipulating arrays, objects, strings, and more, making it easier to work with complex data structures and perform operations like filtering, mapping, sorting, and reducing data. Lodash is known for its consistency, performance, and extensive documentation, making it a go-to choice for many developers.

Alternatives:
underscore+
ramda+
immutable+
immer+
collect.js+
mout+
polished+
fkit+
functional.js+
101+

Tags: javascriptutilitylibrarydata manipulationhelper functions

rambda

v9.2.0(2 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Rambda is a functional programming library for JavaScript that provides a lightweight and efficient alternative to popular libraries like Lodash. It offers a set of utility functions that follow the functional programming paradigm, enabling developers to write cleaner and more concise code. Rambda is known for its immutability and currying support, making it ideal for functional programming enthusiasts.

Alternatives:
lodash+
underscore+
immutable+
immer+
mori+
collect.js+
lazy.js+
baconjs+
folktale+
functional.js+

Tags: javascriptfunctional-programmingutilityimmutablecurrying

Fight!

Popularity

Lodash has been widely used and popular in the JavaScript community for many years. It has a large number of downloads and a well-established reputation. Rambda, on the other hand, is a relatively newer library and has gained popularity for its functional programming approach.

Size

Lodash is a comprehensive utility library that provides a wide range of functions. As a result, it has a larger file size compared to Rambda. Rambda, on the other hand, focuses on providing a small and lightweight alternative to Lodash, making it a suitable choice for projects with strict size constraints.

Modularity

Lodash provides a modular approach where you can import only the specific functions you need. This helps reduce the bundle size and improve performance. Rambda takes a more functional programming approach and aims to provide a more complete functional toolkit. It does not have the same level of modularity as Lodash.

Functionality

Both Lodash and Rambda provide a rich set of utility functions. Lodash has a larger API surface and covers a wide range of use cases, including object manipulation, array manipulation, string manipulation, and more. Rambda focuses on functional programming and includes a smaller set of functions with a focus on immutability and currying.

Performance

Rambda generally performs better in terms of performance compared to Lodash. Its focus on immutability and functional programming techniques can lead to better optimization opportunities. However, the performance difference may not be significant for most typical use cases, and Lodash is still highly optimized.

Community and Support

Lodash has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. Being a well-established library, it has a robust support system. Rambda, although newer, also has an active community and provides sufficient documentation and examples. However, due to its relative newness, the support ecosystem might not be as extensive as Lodash.