Head-to-Head: Lodash vs Mout Analysis

lodash

v4.17.21(over 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/lodashNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Lodash is a widely-used JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of helper functions for simplifying common programming tasks. It offers functions for manipulating arrays, objects, strings, and more, making it easier to work with complex data structures and perform operations like filtering, mapping, and reducing data. Lodash is known for its consistency, performance, and extensive documentation, making it a go-to choice for many developers.

Alternatives:
underscore+
ramda+
rambda+
lazy.js+
mout+
deepdash+
collect.js+
fxts+
baconjs+
folktale+

Tags: javascriptutilitylibrarydata manipulationprogramming tasks

mout

v1.2.4(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Mout is a collection of modular utilities for JavaScript projects, providing a set of helper functions for common programming tasks. It offers a wide range of functions for working with arrays, objects, functions, strings, and more, making it easier to handle data manipulation, functional programming, and general utility tasks.

Alternatives:
lodash+
underscore+
ramda+
rambda+
date-fns+
lazy.js+
collect.js+
immutable+
deepdash+
baconjs+

Tags: javascriptutilitiesmodularfunctional-programmingdata-manipulation

Fight!

Popularity

Lodash is one of the most popular utility libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem with a large user base and a lot of community support. Mout, on the other hand, has a smaller user base and is less popular compared to Lodash.

Size

Lodash offers a modular design where you can cherry-pick individual functions or use the entire library. In its full form, Lodash is larger in size compared to Mout. Mout, however, is designed to be more lightweight, allowing you to include only the specific modules you need, resulting in a smaller bundle size.

Functionality

Both Lodash and Mout provide a comprehensive set of utility functions for common tasks. Lodash offers a broader range of functions, including deep object manipulation, collection operations, and functional programming utilities. Mout focuses on providing small, single-purpose modules that are composable and focused on specific tasks.

Performance

Lodash is generally performant and well-optimized. It has been actively optimized and improved over the years to provide good performance. Mout also aims for performance and strives to be faster than comparable utility libraries. However, the specific performance characteristics may vary based on the individual functions used and the context in which they are used.

Community and Support

Lodash benefits from being widely used and having a large community of developers, resulting in extensive documentation, tutorials, and a vibrant ecosystem. Mout, although less popular, still has an active community, and documentation is available. However, the level of support and available resources for Mout might be lower compared to Lodash.

Compatibility

Both Lodash and Mout can be used in both browser and server-side environments. They support modern JavaScript environments and can work well with popular frameworks and libraries like React, Angular, and Node.js.