Head-to-Head: Little State Machine vs Xstate Analysis


v4.8.0(about 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

little-state-machine is a lightweight state management library for JavaScript applications. It provides a simple and intuitive API for managing and sharing state across different components or modules in your application. With little-state-machine, you can easily create and update global state variables, subscribe to changes, and trigger actions based on state updates.

Alternatives: redux, mobx, vuex

Tags: javascriptstate-managementglobal-statelightweight


v4.38.2(2 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

XState is an open-source state management library for JavaScript and TypeScript applications. It provides a formal and precise way to manage state and side effects, enabling the creation of complex state machines, workflows, and business logic. With XState, you can define state machines as objects, visualize them using a state chart visualizer, and use them to control your application's behavior.

Alternatives: redux, MobX, vuex, NgRx

Tags: javascripttypescriptstate-managementstate-machinesfinite-state-machines



XState is more popular and widely adopted compared to Little State Machine. XState has gained significant traction in the JavaScript community, especially for managing complex state machines. Little State Machine, although less well-known, still has a decent following.


Both packages provide state management solutions, but they have different focuses. Little State Machine is a lightweight and simple global state management library for React applications, while XState is a powerful state management library that focuses on finite state machines and statecharts. XState provides more advanced features and tools for modeling and managing complex state transitions.


XState is designed with scalability in mind and is suitable for handling complex state management scenarios. It provides a declarative and hierarchical approach to state management, making it easier to handle complex state transitions and machine behaviors. Little State Machine, on the other hand, is more suitable for smaller scale applications or projects that require a simpler state management solution.

Developer Experience

Both Little State Machine and XState provide good developer experiences, but they have different approaches. Little State Machine offers a simpler and more straightforward API, making it easier for beginners or developers looking for a lightweight solution. XState, on the other hand, provides a more robust set of features, better type safety with TypeScript, and comprehensive tooling for debugging and visualization of state machines.

Community Support

XState has a larger and more active community compared to Little State Machine. This means that XState benefits from more contributions, bug fixes, and a wider range of community-created resources and integrations. However, Little State Machine has a supportive community as well, and both packages have active maintainers who are responsive to issues and feature requests.