Head-to-Head: Jasmine vs Mocha Analysis

jasmine-core

v5.1.2(22 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Jasmine Core is a JavaScript testing framework that provides a clean and intuitive syntax for writing tests. It is designed to be easy to set up and use, making it a popular choice for testing JavaScript applications and libraries. With Jasmine Core, you can write test suites, define test cases, and assert expected outcomes with a wide range of built-in matchers.

Alternatives:
mocha+
jest+
chai+
ava+
tape+
qunit+
jest-circus+
karma+
cypress+
vitest+

Tags: javascripttestingframeworksyntaxmatchers

mocha

v10.3.0(22 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/mochaNumber of direct dependencies: 20Monthly npm downloads

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript testing framework for Node.js and the browser. It provides a flexible and powerful testing environment for writing and running tests, with support for various testing styles such as BDD (Behavior-Driven Development) and TDD (Test-Driven Development). Mocha allows you to write tests in a clear and expressive manner, making it easy to define test suites, test cases, and assertions.

Alternatives:
jest+
jasmine+
ava+
chai+
tape+
qunit+
jest-circus+
karma+
cypress+
vitest+

Tags: javascripttestingframeworkBDDTDD

Fight!

Popularity

Mocha has a larger community and is more widely adopted compared to Jasmine. It is considered one of the most popular testing frameworks in the JavaScript ecosystem.

Syntax

Jasmine has a more verbose and expressive syntax compared to Mocha. It uses a more BDD-style (Behavior-Driven Development) approach with its `describe`, `it`, and expectation APIs. Mocha, on the other hand, provides a more flexible and minimalist syntax and allows the use of various assertion libraries.

Setup and Configuration

Both Jasmine and Mocha are relatively easy to set up and configure. However, Mocha provides more configuration options and allows greater customization. It also offers a wider range of reporters and integrations with other tools.

Extensibility

Mocha offers better extensibility options compared to Jasmine. It has a plugin system that allows developers to customize and extend its functionality. Jasmine, on the other hand, has fewer options for customization and extending the framework.

Asynchronous Testing

Mocha has built-in support for asynchronous testing and provides features like asynchronous code handling with `async/await` or callback interfaces. Jasmine also supports asynchronous testing but requires the use of its custom `done` callback.

Test Runner

Mocha provides a versatile and powerful test runner, allowing you to run tests in various environments such as the browser or Node.js. Jasmine, on the other hand, was primarily designed for browser-based testing, although it can also be used with Node.js.

Community and Ecosystem

Mocha has a larger and more active community compared to Jasmine, which means there are more resources, plugins, and integrations available for Mocha. Mocha also has better TypeScript support and a more modern ecosystem overall.