Head-to-Head: Jasmine vs Mocha Analysis

jasmine-core

v5.1.2(4 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Jasmine Core is a behavior-driven development (BDD) testing framework for JavaScript. It provides a clean and intuitive syntax for writing test cases and assertions, making it easy to create and maintain test suites. Jasmine Core is known for its simplicity and readability, allowing developers to focus on writing clear and descriptive tests.

Alternatives:
mocha+
jest+
chai+
ava+
tape+
qunit+
jest-circus+
karma+
cypress+
vitest+

Tags: javascripttestingBDDassertionsmocking

mocha

v10.4.0(3 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/mochaNumber of direct dependencies: 20Monthly npm downloads

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework for Node.js and browsers, offering a flexible and developer-friendly testing experience. It supports various testing styles, including BDD (Behavior Driven Development) and TDD (Test Driven Development), and provides a wide range of assertion libraries for making test assertions. Mocha's asynchronous testing capabilities, along with its support for running tests in parallel, make it a popular choice for testing JavaScript applications.

Alternatives:
jest+
jasmine+
ava+
tape+
chai+
jest-circus+
qunit+
karma+
cypress+
vitest+

Tags: javascripttestingframeworkBDDTDD

Fight!

Popularity

Mocha has a larger community and is more widely adopted compared to Jasmine. It is considered one of the most popular testing frameworks in the JavaScript ecosystem.

Syntax

Jasmine has a more verbose and expressive syntax compared to Mocha. It uses a more BDD-style (Behavior-Driven Development) approach with its `describe`, `it`, and expectation APIs. Mocha, on the other hand, provides a more flexible and minimalist syntax and allows the use of various assertion libraries.

Setup and Configuration

Both Jasmine and Mocha are relatively easy to set up and configure. However, Mocha provides more configuration options and allows greater customization. It also offers a wider range of reporters and integrations with other tools.

Extensibility

Mocha offers better extensibility options compared to Jasmine. It has a plugin system that allows developers to customize and extend its functionality. Jasmine, on the other hand, has fewer options for customization and extending the framework.

Asynchronous Testing

Mocha has built-in support for asynchronous testing and provides features like asynchronous code handling with `async/await` or callback interfaces. Jasmine also supports asynchronous testing but requires the use of its custom `done` callback.

Test Runner

Mocha provides a versatile and powerful test runner, allowing you to run tests in various environments such as the browser or Node.js. Jasmine, on the other hand, was primarily designed for browser-based testing, although it can also be used with Node.js.

Community and Ecosystem

Mocha has a larger and more active community compared to Jasmine, which means there are more resources, plugins, and integrations available for Mocha. Mocha also has better TypeScript support and a more modern ecosystem overall.