Head-to-Head: Inferno vs Riot Analysis

inferno

v8.2.3(9 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Inferno is a fast and lightweight JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It is designed to have a similar API to React but with a focus on performance optimization. Inferno boasts a small footprint and efficient rendering, making it ideal for high-performance applications where speed is crucial. It provides features like virtual DOM, server-side rendering, and lifecycle methods for building interactive UI components.

Alternatives:
preact+
react+
vue+
svelte+
solid-js+
mithril+
hyperapp+
riot+
lit+
alpinejs+

Tags: javascriptlibraryuser-interfaceperformancevirtual-dom

riot

v9.4.0(1 day ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Riot is a simple and elegant JavaScript library for building reactive user interfaces. It provides a lightweight and fast alternative to larger frameworks like React and Vue, focusing on simplicity and performance. With its intuitive syntax and small footprint, Riot is easy to learn and use for creating dynamic web applications.

Alternatives:
preact+
inferno+
vue+
svelte+
lit+
alpinejs+
solid-js+
mithril+
hyperapp+
stencil+

Tags: javascriptlibraryreactiveuser-interfaceminimalistic

Fight!

Popularity

Inferno and Riot are both popular JavaScript libraries, but React has a significantly larger user base and is more widely adopted in the industry. React has a strong community and extensive ecosystem, while Inferno and Riot have smaller but dedicated communities.

Size

Inferno is known for its small size and lightweight nature. It is designed to be a fast and efficient alternative to React, with a focus on performance. Riot is also lightweight, but it has a slightly larger footprint compared to Inferno.

Performance

Both Inferno and Riot are designed to be highly performant. Inferno, in particular, is known for its blazing fast rendering speed and minimal overhead. Riot also prioritizes performance, but it may not be as optimized as Inferno in certain scenarios.

Developer Experience

React provides a mature and well-documented API, with a large number of resources and community support available. Inferno aims to provide a similar developer experience to React, with a similar API and component-based architecture. Riot, on the other hand, has a simpler and more lightweight API, which may be easier to learn and use for smaller projects.

Component Model

React and Inferno both follow a virtual DOM-based component model, where components are defined using JSX and can have lifecycle methods. Riot, on the other hand, uses a different approach called 'tags', which are small, self-contained components that can be easily reused. Riot's tag-based approach may be more suitable for smaller projects or projects that require a simpler component model.

Integration and Ecosystem

React has a vast ecosystem with a wide range of third-party libraries, tools, and community support. It is widely adopted and has good integration with other popular libraries and frameworks. Inferno has a smaller ecosystem compared to React but still has a decent number of plugins and tools available. Riot has a smaller ecosystem compared to both React and Inferno, but it has its own set of plugins and tools that are specifically built for Riot.