Head-to-Head: Inferno vs Riot Analysis

inferno

v8.2.3(3 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Inferno is a fast and lightweight JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It is inspired by React and provides a similar API and component-based architecture. However, Inferno is designed to be even faster and more efficient, making it a great choice for performance-critical applications.

Alternatives:
preact+
react+
vue+
svelte+
lit+
alpinejs+
solid-js+
mithril+
hyperapp+
riot+

Tags: javascriptframeworkuser-interfacevirtual-domperformance

riot

v9.1.4(11 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Riot is a simple and lightweight JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It follows a component-based architecture, allowing you to create reusable and modular UI components. Riot provides a simple and intuitive syntax for defining components using HTML-like tags and JavaScript code. It also supports reactive data binding, allowing you to easily update the UI based on changes in data.

Alternatives:
preact+
inferno+
vue+
svelte+
lit+
alpinejs+
solid-js+
mithril+
hyperapp+
petite-vue+

Tags: javascriptlibraryuser-interfacecomponent-basedreactive-data-binding

Fight!

Popularity

Inferno and Riot are both popular JavaScript libraries, but React has a significantly larger user base and is more widely adopted in the industry. React has a strong community and extensive ecosystem, while Inferno and Riot have smaller but dedicated communities.

Size

Inferno is known for its small size and lightweight nature. It is designed to be a fast and efficient alternative to React, with a focus on performance. Riot is also lightweight, but it has a slightly larger footprint compared to Inferno.

Performance

Both Inferno and Riot are designed to be highly performant. Inferno, in particular, is known for its blazing fast rendering speed and minimal overhead. Riot also prioritizes performance, but it may not be as optimized as Inferno in certain scenarios.

Developer Experience

React provides a mature and well-documented API, with a large number of resources and community support available. Inferno aims to provide a similar developer experience to React, with a similar API and component-based architecture. Riot, on the other hand, has a simpler and more lightweight API, which may be easier to learn and use for smaller projects.

Component Model

React and Inferno both follow a virtual DOM-based component model, where components are defined using JSX and can have lifecycle methods. Riot, on the other hand, uses a different approach called 'tags', which are small, self-contained components that can be easily reused. Riot's tag-based approach may be more suitable for smaller projects or projects that require a simpler component model.

Integration and Ecosystem

React has a vast ecosystem with a wide range of third-party libraries, tools, and community support. It is widely adopted and has good integration with other popular libraries and frameworks. Inferno has a smaller ecosystem compared to React but still has a decent number of plugins and tools available. Riot has a smaller ecosystem compared to both React and Inferno, but it has its own set of plugins and tools that are specifically built for Riot.