Head-to-Head: Inferno vs Marko Analysis

inferno

v8.2.3(6 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Inferno is a fast and lightweight JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It is designed to have a similar API to React but with a focus on performance optimization. Inferno boasts a small bundle size and efficient rendering capabilities, making it ideal for high-performance applications. It provides features like virtual DOM, server-side rendering, and component lifecycle methods.

Alternatives:
preact+
react+
vue+
svelte+
lit+
alpinejs+
solid-js+
mithril+
hyperapp+
riot+

Tags: javascriptlibraryuser-interfaceperformancevirtual-dom

marko

v5.35.4(6 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 14Monthly npm downloads

Marko is a fast and lightweight JavaScript UI library for building web applications with a focus on server-side rendering. It offers a component-based architecture that allows developers to create reusable and encapsulated UI components. Marko provides efficient server-side rendering, resulting in faster page loads and improved SEO performance.

Alternatives:
pug+
handlebars+
ejs+
mustache+
nunjucks+
hbs+
dustjs-linkedin+
doT+
twig+
squirrelly+

Tags: javascriptUI libraryserver-side renderingcomponent-basedperformance optimization

Fight!

Popularity

Inferno and Marko are both popular JavaScript libraries, but React has a significantly larger community and adoption compared to both of them. React has been widely adopted by developers and has a large ecosystem of libraries and tools built around it.

Performance

Inferno is known for its exceptional performance and is often considered one of the fastest JavaScript UI libraries. It achieves this by using a highly optimized virtual DOM diffing algorithm. Marko also focuses on performance and claims to be faster than React, but it may not match the performance of Inferno in certain scenarios.

Developer Experience

React provides a great developer experience with its extensive documentation, large community support, and a rich ecosystem of third-party libraries and tools. Inferno also offers a good developer experience with a similar API to React, making it easy for React developers to switch. Marko, on the other hand, has a smaller community and ecosystem, which may result in fewer resources and community support.

Scalability

React is widely used in large-scale applications and has proven to be highly scalable. It has features like React Fiber that enable efficient rendering and handling of large component trees. Inferno, being highly performant, can also handle large-scale applications effectively. Marko, although less popular, is designed to be scalable and has been used in production by some companies, but it may not have the same level of community support and resources for scalability as React.

Learning Curve

React has a relatively gentle learning curve, especially for developers familiar with JavaScript and HTML. Inferno has a similar API to React, making it easy for React developers to get started. Marko has its own syntax and template engine, which may require some additional learning for developers new to the library.