Head-to-Head: Foundation vs MaterializeCSS Analysis

foundation-sites

v6.8.1(8 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Foundation Sites is a responsive front-end framework that provides a robust set of tools and components for building modern websites and web applications. It offers a grid system, responsive design utilities, customizable styles, and a variety of pre-built components like navigation bars, buttons, modals, and more. Foundation Sites prioritizes mobile-first design and accessibility, making it easy to create visually appealing and user-friendly interfaces.

Alternatives:
bootstrap+
bulma+
tailwindcss+
semantic-ui+
uikit+
materialize+
tachyons+
spectre.css+
primer-css+
pure+

Tags: front-endframeworkresponsive-designcomponentsmobile-first

materialize-css

v1.0.0(over 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/materialize-cssNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Materialize CSS is a modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design principles. It provides a clean and intuitive user interface with ready-to-use components like buttons, forms, cards, and navigation elements. Materialize CSS offers a grid system for easy layout structuring and supports customization through Sass variables. It also includes JavaScript components for interactive elements like modals, dropdowns, and sliders.

Alternatives:
material-ui+
bootstrap+
bulma+
tailwindcss+
foundation-sites+
semantic-ui-react+
antd+
vuetify+
chakra-ui+
primevue+

Tags: cssframeworkresponsivematerial-designcomponents

Fight!

Popularity

Both Foundation Sites and Materialize CSS are popular front-end frameworks, but Materialize CSS has gained more popularity in recent years. It has a larger community and more active development.

Design and Styling

Foundation Sites focuses on providing a flexible and customizable design system, allowing developers to create unique and custom designs. Materialize CSS, on the other hand, follows the Material Design guidelines and provides a more opinionated and consistent design language.

Components and Features

Both frameworks offer a wide range of components and features to build responsive and interactive web applications. Foundation Sites provides a larger set of components and more advanced features, such as a responsive grid system, flexbox support, and advanced form styling. Materialize CSS offers a more streamlined set of components, focusing on the Material Design aesthetic.

Customization and Theming

Foundation Sites provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to easily modify the framework's styles and components to match their brand or design requirements. Materialize CSS also offers some level of customization, but it is more limited compared to Foundation Sites.

Browser Support

Both frameworks have good browser support and are compatible with modern browsers. However, Foundation Sites has better support for older browsers, providing graceful degradation for older versions of Internet Explorer.

Documentation and Learning Curve

Both frameworks have well-documented APIs and provide comprehensive guides and examples. However, Materialize CSS has more beginner-friendly documentation and a lower learning curve, making it easier for developers new to front-end development to get started.

Integration with JavaScript Frameworks

Both Foundation Sites and Materialize CSS can be integrated with popular JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue.js. However, Materialize CSS has better official support and more community resources for integration with these frameworks.