Head-to-Head: Foundation vs Material Components for the web Analysis

foundation-sites

v6.8.1(10 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Foundation Sites is a responsive front-end framework that provides a robust set of tools and components for building modern and mobile-friendly websites. It offers a grid system, responsive navigation, buttons, forms, and various UI elements to streamline the development process. Foundation Sites is known for its flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to create unique designs while maintaining a consistent user experience across devices.

Alternatives:
bootstrap+
tailwindcss+
bulma+
semantic-ui+
uikit+
materialize+
tachyons+
spectre.css+
primer-css+
milligram+

Tags: front-endresponsiveframeworkmobile-firstUI components

material-components-web

v14.0.0(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 49Monthly npm downloads

Material Components for the Web is a collection of modular and customizable UI components based on Google's Material Design guidelines. It provides a set of ready-to-use components like buttons, cards, dialogs, and more, with consistent styling and behavior across different platforms and devices. Material Components for the Web offers a seamless integration with popular front-end frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue, making it easy to create visually appealing and user-friendly interfaces.

Alternatives:
@mui/material+
antd+
chakra-ui+
primevue+
vuetify+
quasar+
blueprintjs/core+
react-bootstrap+
semantic-ui-react+
evergreen-ui+

Tags: ui-componentsmaterial-designmodularcustomizablefront-end

Fight!

Popularity

Material-Components-Web is more popular and widely used compared to Foundation-Sites. Material-Components-Web is backed by Google and has gained significant traction in the web development community, while Foundation-Sites has a smaller but dedicated user base.

Design Philosophy

Foundation-Sites follows a more customizable and flexible approach, allowing developers to create unique designs. Material-Components-Web, on the other hand, follows Material Design guidelines and provides a consistent and visually appealing UI.

Component Availability

Material-Components-Web offers a comprehensive collection of ready-to-use UI components based on Material Design, including buttons, cards, dialogs, and more. Foundation-Sites also provides a wide range of components, but the selection may not be as extensive as Material-Components-Web.

CSS Framework

Foundation-Sites is primarily known as a CSS framework that provides a responsive grid system, typography, and other CSS utilities. Material-Components-Web also includes CSS styles, but it focuses more on providing pre-styled UI components adhering to Material Design guidelines.

Integration with Frameworks

Both Foundation-Sites and Material-Components-Web can be integrated with popular JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue. However, Material-Components-Web has more extensive documentation and official integration guides for these frameworks.

Customization and Theming

Foundation-Sites offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to easily modify the design and style of components to match their requirements. Material-Components-Web also supports customization, but it follows Material Design guidelines, which may limit the extent of customization.

Community Support

Material-Components-Web benefits from a larger and more active community due to its popularity and backing from Google. This means more resources, tutorials, and community-driven support are available. Foundation-Sites has a smaller community but still provides decent support through its dedicated user base.