Head-to-Head: Fela vs Material Components for the web Analysis
fela
v12.2.1(about 2 years ago)
Fela is a high-performance, framework-agnostic styling library for React and other JavaScript frameworks. It follows a functional and atomic CSS approach, generating styles dynamically based on component props. Fela's unique feature is its ability to generate atomic CSS classes on the fly, resulting in smaller CSS bundles and improved performance.
Alternatives:
styled-components-+
emotion-+
jss-+
aphrodite-+
linaria-+
stitches-+
glamor-+
styletron-+
cxs-+
goober-+
Tags: javascriptstylingCSS-in-JSReactperformance
material-components-web
v14.0.0(over 2 years ago)
Material Components for the Web is a collection of modular and customizable UI components based on Google's Material Design guidelines. It provides a set of ready-to-use components like buttons, cards, dialogs, and more, with consistent styling and behavior across different platforms and devices. Material Components for the Web offers a modern and visually appealing design language, making it easy to create responsive and user-friendly web interfaces.
Material-components-web is a popular package developed by Google and widely used in the industry. It has a large community of contributors and is widely adopted in the React ecosystem. On the other hand, Fela is a less popular library but still has a dedicated user base and active community.
Styling Approach
Fela is a powerful and flexible CSS-in-JS library that provides a robust styling solution for React applications. It offers a unique approach to styling by generating atomic CSS classes at runtime and utilizing a highly performant rendering engine. Material-components-web, on the other hand, is a UI component library that follows the Material Design guidelines. It provides pre-styled components out-of-the-box, making it easy to create visually appealing interfaces.
Customization
Fela excels in customization. Its atomic CSS classes allow for fine-grained control over styles, making it easier to create reusable and themeable components. Fela also provides powerful plugin architecture for extending its capabilities. Material-components-web, on the other hand, offers a predefined set of styled components that are designed to adhere to Material Design specifications. While it provides some customization options, they might be more limited compared to Fela's flexibility.
Integration
Both libraries integrate well with React, but their approaches differ. Fela seamlessly integrates with React using custom hooks or Higher Order Components (HOCs) to provide styling capabilities. Material-components-web, on the other hand, requires specific usage of its pre-styled components. It follows a more traditional approach for integrating with React, utilizing props and components hierarchy to handle rendering and interactions.
Community Support
Material-components-web benefits from being developed and maintained by Google, which ensures continuous support and updates. It has a large community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation and resources. Fela has a smaller community but still offers active support and regular updates.
