Head-to-Head: ESLint vs JSHint Analysis

eslint

v9.5.0(3 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/eslintNumber of direct dependencies: 34Monthly npm downloads

ESLint is a popular static code analysis tool for identifying problematic patterns in JavaScript code. It enforces coding standards and best practices, helping developers write cleaner and more consistent code. ESLint is highly configurable, allowing you to customize rules, plugins, and environments to suit your project's specific needs. It supports ES6 and beyond, JSX, and TypeScript, making it versatile for modern JavaScript development.

Alternatives:
tslint+
stylelint+
prettier+
jshint+
jscs+
standard+
xo+
eslint-plugin-vue+
eslint-plugin-react+
eslint-plugin-import+

Tags: javascriptlintingstatic-analysiscode-qualityeslint

jshint

v2.13.6(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/jshintNumber of direct dependencies: 7Monthly npm downloads

JSHint is a popular static code analysis tool for JavaScript that helps identify potential errors and coding conventions violations in your codebase. It provides configurable options to enforce coding standards and best practices, such as detecting unused variables, missing semicolons, and possible syntax errors. JSHint is highly customizable and can be integrated into various development workflows to ensure code quality and consistency.

Alternatives:
eslint+
prettier+
standard+
stylelint+
tslint+
xo+
jscs+
semistandard+
eslint-config-airbnb+
eslint-plugin-vue+

Tags: javascriptstatic-code-analysislintingcoding-standardserror-detection

Fight!

Popularity

ESLint is currently more popular than JSHint. It has gained significant adoption in the JavaScript community and is widely used in modern JavaScript projects. JSHint, while still used, has seen a decrease in popularity in recent years.

Features

ESLint provides a wider range of features compared to JSHint. It supports modern ECMAScript standards, has support for plugin architecture, and offers more extensive customization options. JSHint, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more lightweight set of features.

Configuration

ESLint has a more flexible and configurable rule system, allowing developers to customize the linter based on their project requirements. JSHint, while also configurable, has a more limited set of options and rules.

Integration

ESLint integrates well with modern development tools and frameworks, such as webpack and Babel. It also has excellent support for TypeScript and JSX. JSHint, on the other hand, may require additional configuration and setup to integrate with newer tools and frameworks.

Developer Experience

ESLint has a larger and more active community, providing extensive documentation and support. It also has better tooling and editor integrations, which enhance the developer experience. JSHint, while still maintained, lacks some of the developer experience enhancements provided by ESLint.

Performance

JSHint is generally faster and more lightweight compared to ESLint. If performance is a crucial factor, especially in larger codebases, JSHint might be a better choice. However, ESLint's performance has improved over time, and with modern hardware, the difference might not be as significant.