Head-to-Head: Ember vs Preact Analysis

ember-source

v5.9.0(16 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 47Monthly npm downloads

Ember Source is the core library of the Ember.js framework, providing a robust set of tools and conventions for building ambitious web applications. It offers features like two-way data binding, computed properties, routing, and a strong focus on developer ergonomics. Ember Source follows the convention over configuration principle, making it easy to get started with structured and scalable applications.

Alternatives:
vue+
react+
angular+
svelte+
preact+
lit+
stimulus+
alpinejs+
mithril+
marionette+

Tags: javascriptframeworkweb applicationsdata bindingrouting

preact

v10.22.0(about 1 month ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Preact is a fast and lightweight alternative to React, offering a similar API and functionality while being smaller in size. It provides a Virtual DOM implementation, component-based architecture, and state management capabilities, making it ideal for building efficient and performant web applications. Preact is actively maintained and optimized for speed and memory usage, making it a popular choice for projects where a smaller footprint is desired.

Alternatives:
react+
inferno+
vue+
svelte+
lit+
alpinejs+
solid-js+
mithril+
hyperapp+
riot+

Tags: javascriptlibraryvirtual-domcomponent-basedperformance

Fight!

Popularity

Preact is a lightweight alternative to React and has gained popularity for its small size and fast performance. Ember, on the other hand, is a more established framework with a dedicated community but has seen a decline in popularity compared to React and Preact.

Size and Performance

Preact is significantly smaller in size compared to Ember, making it a more lightweight option. Preact also boasts better performance due to its smaller footprint and efficient rendering. Ember, while feature-rich, can be heavier and may not perform as well in certain scenarios.

Developer Experience

Preact provides a similar API to React, making it easier for React developers to transition. It also offers a simpler and more intuitive development experience. Ember, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and a more opinionated structure, which can be beneficial for larger projects but may be overwhelming for smaller ones.

Community and Ecosystem

React has a massive community and a rich ecosystem of libraries and tools, making it easy to find solutions and resources. Preact benefits from this ecosystem as it is compatible with most React libraries. Ember has a dedicated community but may have a more limited ecosystem compared to React and Preact.

Scalability

Ember is designed for large-scale applications with built-in conventions and tools for managing complexity. It provides more structure out of the box, which can be beneficial for scaling projects. Preact, being lightweight and flexible, may require more manual setup for scalability but can still be suitable for smaller to medium-sized applications.