Head-to-Head: ember-apollo-client vs urql Analysis


v4.1.1(5 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 7Monthly npm downloads

Ember Apollo Client is a powerful integration between Ember.js and Apollo Client, which is a popular GraphQL client for JavaScript. It allows Ember.js developers to easily fetch and manage data from a GraphQL API in their applications.

Alternatives: ember-graphql-request, ember-apollo, ember-apollo-client-preset

Tags: javascriptember.jsgraphqlclientdata-fetching


v4.0.5(2 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 2Monthly npm downloads

Urql is a lightweight and versatile GraphQL client for React applications. It aims to provide a faster and simpler way to query GraphQL APIs compared to other more complex solutions. Urql features a minimal API layer, efficient caching, and supports real-time updates with subscriptions. It also provides an extensible environment, allowing you to customize it to fit your specific needs.

Alternatives: apollo-client, relay, graphql-request

Tags: graphqlclientreactcachingreal-time-updates



Both Ember Apollo Client and Urql have their own communities and user bases. However, Urql has gained significant popularity in recent years due to its lightweight and flexible nature, while Ember Apollo Client is more specific to the Ember.js framework and has a smaller user community.

Integration with Frameworks

Ember Apollo Client is specifically designed for seamless integration with the Ember.js framework. It provides Ember-specific features and conventions, making it easier to work with GraphQL in Ember applications. On the other hand, Urql is a framework-agnostic library that can be used with any JavaScript framework, including Ember.js.

GraphQL Features

Both libraries provide support for GraphQL. Ember Apollo Client is built on top of Apollo Client and inherits its extensive set of features, including caching, optimistic UI, and subscriptions. Urql, on the other hand, has a more lightweight approach and focuses on offering a minimalistic API with basic GraphQL functionality.

Learning Curve

Ember Apollo Client requires familiarity with the Ember.js framework. If you are already experienced with Ember.js, integrating and working with Ember Apollo Client will be relatively straightforward. Urql has a simpler and more lightweight API, which might make it easier to learn and use, especially if you are not already familiar with Ember.js.

Community Support

Both packages have active communities and provide support through forums, documentation, and GitHub repositories. However, since Urql has gained wider popularity and is framework-agnostic, it might have a larger and more diverse community for seeking help, finding examples, and getting support.


In terms of performance, Urql has a focus on being lightweight and optimized for fast rendering. It adopts a fine-grained approach to control caching and provides better fine-tuning capabilities. Ember Apollo Client leverages the caching and data management features from Apollo Client, which might introduce additional overhead compared to the more lightweight approach of Urql.