Head-to-Head: Ejs vs Mustache.js Analysis

ejs

v3.1.10(2 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/ejsNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

EJS (Embedded JavaScript) is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. It allows you to embed JavaScript code within your HTML templates, making it easy to create dynamic content. EJS supports features like template inheritance, partials, and control flow statements, enabling you to build reusable and maintainable templates.

Alternatives:
pug+
mustache+
handlebars+
nunjucks+
hogan.js+
twig+
dustjs-linkedin+
doT+
marko+
squirrelly+

Tags: javascripttemplatinghtmlserver-side-renderingdynamic-content

mustache

v4.2.0(about 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/mustacheNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax that can be used for HTML, config files, source code, or any other text-based format. It is easy to read and write, making it a popular choice for generating dynamic content in web applications. Mustache templates are simple and maintainable, focusing on the separation of concerns between data and presentation.

Alternatives:
handlebars+
ejs+
pug+
hogan.js+
nunjucks+
dustjs-linkedin+
doT+
marko+
squirrelly+
underscore-template+

Tags: templatesyntaxlogic-lesswebdynamic-content

Fight!

Popularity

Both EJS and Mustache are popular npm packages for server-side templating in JavaScript. However, EJS has gained more popularity and has a larger community adoption compared to Mustache.

Syntax

EJS has a template syntax similar to HTML with embedded JavaScript code using <% %> tags. Mustache, on the other hand, follows a simpler and more lightweight syntax with {{ }} tags.

Features

EJS provides more advanced features compared to Mustache. EJS supports complex template logic including conditional statements and loops, partials, and layout support. Mustache, on the other hand, is focused on simplicity and does not include advanced features like complex template logic.

Integration

Both EJS and Mustache can be used with various server-side frameworks and libraries. EJS has better integration with Express.js and provides middleware for seamless integration. Mustache is not tied to any specific framework and can be used with any JavaScript environment.

Extensibility

EJS allows for custom tags, filters, and includes a plugin system, making it more extensible. Mustache, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for custom tags or filters, which limits its extensibility.

Performance

Mustache is generally considered to have better performance compared to EJS due to its simpler syntax and minimalistic approach. However, the performance difference might vary based on the specific use case and template complexity.