Head-to-Head: Ehtml vs Handlebars.js Analysis

ehtml

v1.0.21(about 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 15Monthly npm downloads

HTML Framework that allows you write no JavaScript code at all.

handlebars

v4.7.8(11 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 5Monthly npm downloads

Handlebars is a popular templating engine that allows developers to create dynamic HTML templates with ease. It provides a simple syntax for embedding variables, expressions, and helpers into templates, making it easy to generate HTML content dynamically. Handlebars supports partials, helpers, and block expressions, enabling developers to create reusable and modular templates.

Alternatives:
pug+
ejs+
mustache+
nunjucks+
hogan.js+
dustjs-linkedin+
doT+
marko+
squirrelly+
eta+

Tags: javascripttemplatinghtmldynamic-contentpartials

Fight!

Popularity

Handlebars is a well-established and widely used templating library with a large community and extensive adoption. eHTML, on the other hand, is a relatively newer library and may not have the same level of popularity and community support as Handlebars.

Syntax

Handlebars uses a syntax that is similar to HTML with additional templating features, making it easy to learn and use for developers familiar with HTML. eHTML, on the other hand, introduces a new syntax that aims to provide a more concise and intuitive templating experience.

Features

Handlebars provides a rich set of features including conditionals, loops, partials, and helpers, making it suitable for complex templating scenarios. eHTML focuses on simplicity and aims to provide a minimalistic templating solution with a smaller feature set.

Performance

Handlebars is known for its good performance and efficient template rendering. eHTML also aims to be performant and claims to have a faster rendering speed compared to other templating libraries. However, the actual performance may vary depending on the specific use case and implementation.

Integration

Handlebars has extensive integration with various frameworks and libraries, including popular ones like Ember.js and Express.js. eHTML may have limited integration options and may require additional configuration or custom integration for specific frameworks or use cases.

Community and Documentation

Handlebars has a large and active community, which means there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and community support available. It also has comprehensive documentation. eHTML, being a newer library, may have a smaller community and limited documentation compared to Handlebars.