Head-to-Head: Dust.js vs Nunjucks Analysis

dustjs-linkedin

v3.0.1(over 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/dustjs-linkedinNumber of direct dependencies: 2Monthly npm downloads

Dustjs-linkedin is a powerful and lightweight JavaScript templating engine that focuses on speed and efficiency. It is designed to render templates with minimal overhead, making it ideal for high-performance applications. Dustjs-linkedin supports template inheritance, partials, and helpers, allowing for modular and reusable template components.

Alternatives:
handlebars+
mustache+
ejs+
pug+
nunjucks+
hogan.js+
doT+
marko+
squirrelly+
underscore-template+

Tags: javascripttemplatingperformancemodularreusable

nunjucks

v3.2.4(about 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/nunjucksNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Nunjucks is a powerful templating engine for JavaScript that is heavily inspired by Jinja2, a template engine for Python. It allows for creating dynamic templates with features like template inheritance, macros, filters, and control structures. Nunjucks is widely used for generating HTML, emails, and other text-based formats in web applications.

Alternatives:
pug+
handlebars+
ejs+
mustache+
twig+
liquidjs+
hogan.js+
dustjs-linkedin+
swig+
squirrelly+

Tags: javascripttemplatingdynamicHTMLNode.js

Fight!

Popularity

Nunjucks is more popular and widely used compared to Dust.js. It has a larger community and a more active development ecosystem.

Template Syntax

Dust.js uses a more concise and minimalistic template syntax, while Nunjucks provides a more feature-rich and expressive syntax. Nunjucks supports features like template inheritance, macros, and filters, making it more flexible for complex templating needs.

Performance

Dust.js is known for its high performance and efficient rendering, especially for large-scale applications. Nunjucks also performs well, but it may have a slightly higher overhead due to its more feature-rich syntax and additional functionality.

Integration

Both packages can be easily integrated into different environments. Dust.js is often used with Node.js and can be seamlessly integrated with Express.js. Nunjucks, on the other hand, is commonly used with frameworks like Express.js, Koa, and can also be used in the browser.

Extensibility

Nunjucks provides a more extensible architecture, allowing developers to create custom filters, extensions, and loaders. Dust.js also supports custom helpers and filters, but its extensibility options are not as extensive as Nunjucks.

Documentation

Both packages have well-documented APIs and provide comprehensive guides and examples. However, Nunjucks has more extensive and user-friendly documentation, making it easier for developers to get started and find answers to their questions.