Head-to-Head: Dust.js vs Mustache.js Analysis

dustjs-linkedin

v3.0.1(over 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/dustjs-linkedinNumber of direct dependencies: 2Monthly npm downloads

Dustjs-linkedin is a powerful and lightweight JavaScript templating engine that focuses on speed and efficiency. It is designed to render templates with minimal overhead, making it ideal for high-performance applications. Dustjs-linkedin supports template inheritance, partials, and helpers, allowing for modular and reusable template components.

Alternatives:
handlebars+
mustache+
ejs+
pug+
nunjucks+
hogan.js+
doT+
marko+
squirrelly+
underscore-template+

Tags: javascripttemplatingperformancemodularreusable

mustache

v4.2.0(about 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/mustacheNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax that can be used for HTML, config files, source code, or any other text-based format. It is easy to read and write, making it a popular choice for generating dynamic content in web applications. Mustache templates are simple and maintainable, focusing on the separation of concerns between data and presentation.

Alternatives:
handlebars+
ejs+
pug+
hogan.js+
nunjucks+
dustjs-linkedin+
doT+
marko+
squirrelly+
underscore-template+

Tags: templatesyntaxlogic-lesswebdynamic-content

Fight!

Popularity

Mustache is a more popular and widely used templating library compared to Dust.js. Mustache has been around for longer and has a larger community and ecosystem.

Size

Dust.js is a more feature-rich and powerful templating library, but it comes with a larger file size compared to Mustache. Mustache, on the other hand, is lightweight and has a smaller footprint.

Functionality

Both libraries provide similar functionality for templating, including variable interpolation, conditionals, and loops. However, Dust.js offers more advanced features like partials, filters, and asynchronous rendering, making it more suitable for complex templating scenarios.

Syntax

Mustache has a simple and intuitive syntax that is easy to learn and use. Dust.js, on the other hand, has a more complex and verbose syntax, which may require a steeper learning curve for new users.

Integration

Mustache can be easily integrated with various frameworks and libraries, including React, Angular, and Node.js. Dust.js, on the other hand, is primarily designed for server-side rendering and may require additional setup and configuration for client-side integration.

Community and Support

Mustache has a larger and more active community compared to Dust.js. It has extensive documentation, tutorials, and a wide range of third-party resources available. Dust.js, while still actively maintained, has a smaller community and fewer resources.