Head-to-Head: Dust.js vs Ehtml Analysis

dustjs-linkedin

v3.0.1(over 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/dustjs-linkedinNumber of direct dependencies: 2Monthly npm downloads

Dustjs-linkedin is a powerful and lightweight JavaScript templating engine that focuses on speed and efficiency. It is designed to render templates with minimal overhead, making it ideal for high-performance applications. Dustjs-linkedin supports template inheritance, partials, and helpers, allowing for modular and reusable template components.

Alternatives:
handlebars+
mustache+
ejs+
pug+
nunjucks+
hogan.js+
doT+
marko+
squirrelly+
underscore-template+

Tags: javascripttemplatingperformancemodularreusable

ehtml

v1.0.21(over 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 15Monthly npm downloads

HTML Framework that allows you write no JavaScript code at all.

Fight!

Popularity

Dustjs-linkedin has been around for longer and has a larger user base compared to ehtml. It has been widely adopted and used in various projects. Ehtml, on the other hand, is a relatively newer package and may not have the same level of popularity and community support as Dustjs-linkedin.

Functionality

Dustjs-linkedin is a powerful and feature-rich templating engine that provides advanced features like template inheritance, partials, and filters. It is designed for large-scale applications and offers robust support for complex templating needs. Ehtml, on the other hand, is a lightweight and minimalistic templating engine that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides basic templating capabilities without the advanced features offered by Dustjs-linkedin.

Performance

Dustjs-linkedin is known for its excellent performance and scalability. It is optimized for handling large templates and can efficiently render complex data structures. Ehtml is also lightweight and performs well, but it may not be as optimized for handling large-scale templates and complex data structures as Dustjs-linkedin.

Developer Experience

Dustjs-linkedin has a mature and well-documented API, making it easier for developers to work with. It has a large community and extensive resources available for learning and troubleshooting. Ehtml, being a newer package, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available. However, it is designed to be simple and intuitive, providing a straightforward developer experience.

Compatibility

Dustjs-linkedin is primarily designed for server-side rendering (SSR) and can be used with various server-side frameworks. It also has support for client-side rendering (CSR) using JavaScript. Ehtml, on the other hand, is primarily focused on client-side rendering and is designed to work seamlessly with modern JavaScript frameworks like React and Vue.js.