Head-to-Head: Caterpillar vs Roarr Analysis


v6.8.0(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Caterpillar is a flexible and feature-rich logging library for Node.js applications. It provides a simple and intuitive API for logging messages with different log levels, allowing developers to easily track and debug their application's behavior.

Alternatives: winston, bunyan, pino

Tags: node.jslogginglog-levelslog-transportlog-formatting


v7.15.1(2 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 6Monthly npm downloads

Roarr is a lightweight and efficient logging library for Node.js and browsers. It provides a simple and flexible API for logging structured messages with customizable log levels, timestamps, and context information. Roarr supports various output formats, including JSON and plain text, and allows you to easily integrate with existing logging systems.

Alternatives: winston, bunyan, pino

Tags: javascriptloggingnode.jsbrowserstructured-logging



Both Caterpillar and Roarr are relatively lesser-known npm packages in the logging space. They have a limited user base compared to more popular logging libraries like Winston or Bunyan.

Features and Functionality

Caterpillar is a simple yet flexible logging library that provides basic logging capabilities, such as logging to console, file, or a custom transport. It allows you to customize log formatting and level filtering. On the other hand, Roarr is a more feature-rich logging library that supports structured logging, enabling you to log complex data structures and capture additional metadata with your logs. It offers advanced features like log levels, focuses on performance, and provides a powerful logging API.

API Design and Developer Experience

Caterpillar follows a simple and straightforward API design, which makes it easy to get started with. It has a minimalistic approach and requires less configuration. Roarr, on the other hand, provides a more extensive API with various methods and options to customize the logging behavior. It may have a slightly steeper learning curve for beginners, but offers greater control and flexibility for advanced logging requirements.

Compatibility and Integration

Caterpillar and Roarr are both compatible with Node.js and can be used in server-side applications. However, Caterpillar is not specifically designed for any specific framework or library, whereas Roarr is built to work well with JavaScript and TypeScript projects, including frameworks like React or Node.js applications. Roarr provides TypeScript type definitions out of the box.

Maintenance and Community Support

Both packages have received updates in the past, but Caterpillar seems to have a more active community and recent maintenance activity. Roarr, on the other hand, has fewer contributors and may have a slower update cycle. It's important to consider community support and maintenance when selecting a logging library, as it ensures ongoing bug fixes, updates, and compatibility with new versions of Node.js.