Head-to-Head: Casperjs vs Nightmare Analysis

casperjs

v1.1.4(about 7 years ago)

This package is deprecated. Consider finding alternatives.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/casperjsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

CasperJS is a navigation scripting and testing utility for PhantomJS and SlimerJS. It allows you to automate interactions with web pages, perform functional testing, and scrape information from websites. CasperJS simplifies the process of writing and running browser automation scripts by providing a high-level API for common tasks like clicking links, filling forms, and capturing screenshots.

Alternatives:
puppeteer+
playwright+
nightwatch+
webdriverio+
testcafe+
cypress+
selenium-webdriver+
taiko+
protractor+
jest-puppeteer+

Tags: automationtestingweb scrapingPhantomJSSlimerJS

nightmare

v3.0.2(about 5 years ago)

This package is deprecated. Consider finding alternatives.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/nightmareNumber of direct dependencies: 14Monthly npm downloads

Nightmare is a high-level browser automation library for Node.js, built on top of Electron. It allows developers to automate interactions with web pages, such as clicking elements, filling forms, and scraping data. Nightmare provides a simple API for creating and running browser automation scripts, making it ideal for tasks like web scraping, testing, and UI automation.

Alternatives:
puppeteer+
playwright+
cypress+
webdriverio+
testcafe+
selenium-webdriver+
taiko+
casperjs+
zombie+
phantom+

Tags: node.jsbrowser automationweb scrapingtestingUI automation

Fight!

Popularity

Nightmare is more popular and widely used compared to CasperJS. Nightmare has gained popularity for its ease of use and powerful features, while CasperJS has seen a decline in usage over the years.

Functionality

Both CasperJS and Nightmare are headless browser automation tools, but Nightmare is known for its simpler API and better documentation. Nightmare also provides more modern features and better support for newer browser technologies.

Performance

Nightmare is generally considered to be faster and more efficient than CasperJS. Nightmare uses Electron as its backend, which provides better performance compared to CasperJS, which uses PhantomJS.

Maintenance

Nightmare is actively maintained and has a more responsive community compared to CasperJS, which has seen a decrease in maintenance and updates. Choosing Nightmare may ensure better long-term support and compatibility.

Scalability

Nightmare is more scalable and suitable for larger projects due to its better performance and active maintenance. CasperJS, on the other hand, may face scalability issues in the long run due to its declining popularity and maintenance.