Head-to-Head: Bunyan vs Signale Analysis

bunyan

v1.8.15(over 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/bunyanNumber of direct dependencies: 4Monthly npm downloads

Bunyan is a simple and fast JSON logging library for Node.js applications. It is designed to be easy to use and highly performant, making it ideal for logging structured data in a production environment. Bunyan allows you to log messages at different levels of severity, add contextual information to log entries, and easily integrate with various logging transports like files, streams, and external services.

Alternatives:
pino+
winston+
log4js+
morgan+
bole+
debug+
roarr+
consola+
signale+
winston-daily-rotate-file+

Tags: node.jsloggingJSONstructured-dataperformance

signale

v1.4.0(over 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/signaleNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Signale is a highly configurable and easy-to-use logging library for Node.js and browsers. It offers a variety of log levels, colors, and symbols to customize and enhance the logging output. Signale provides a clean and structured way to log messages, making it suitable for both simple and complex logging needs. It supports logging to the console, files, or any writable stream.

Alternatives:
winston+
pino+
log4js+
bunyan+
consola+
debug+
morgan+
winston-daily-rotate-file+
roarr+
loglevel+

Tags: loggingNode.jsbrowserconfigurablelog levels

Fight!

Popularity

Both Bunyan and Signale are popular logging libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem. Bunyan has been around for longer and has a larger user base, while Signale has gained popularity for its simplicity and ease of use.

Features

Bunyan is a highly configurable logging library that provides structured logging with support for log levels, log streams, and log rotation. It is well-suited for complex logging scenarios and large-scale applications. Signale, on the other hand, focuses on providing a beautiful and customizable logging experience with support for log levels, colors, icons, and additional metadata.

Integration

Bunyan is primarily designed for server-side applications and integrates well with frameworks like Express and Hapi. It also has support for logging to various destinations such as files, streams, and external services. Signale, on the other hand, is more versatile and can be used in both server-side and client-side applications. It provides a simple and intuitive API for logging in any JavaScript environment.

Developer Experience

Bunyan has a more complex configuration and setup process compared to Signale. It requires defining loggers, serializers, and log streams. Signale, on the other hand, has a simpler and more straightforward API, making it easier to get started with logging. It also provides a beautiful and readable output format by default.

Customization

Both libraries offer customization options, but Signale provides more flexibility in terms of customizing log formats, colors, and icons. It allows developers to create their own loggers and extend the functionality as needed. Bunyan, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a structured logging experience with less emphasis on customization.

Community and Maintenance

Both Bunyan and Signale have active communities and are well-maintained. Bunyan has been around for a longer time and has a larger user base, which means it has a more mature ecosystem and extensive documentation. Signale, although relatively newer, has gained popularity and has a growing community with regular updates and improvements.