Head-to-Head: Bunyan vs Signale Analysis

bunyan

v1.8.15(about 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/bunyanNumber of direct dependencies: 4Monthly npm downloads

Bunyan is a simple and fast JSON logging library for Node.js applications. It provides a structured and customizable logging solution, allowing you to easily log events, errors, and other information in a structured format. Bunyan logs are written in JSON format, making them easy to parse and analyze.

Alternatives:
pino+
winston+
log4js+
morgan+
debug+
roarr+
consola+
signale+
winston-daily-rotate-file+
bunyan-debug-stream+

Tags: node.jsloggingjsonperformancestructured-logs

signale

v1.4.0(about 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/signaleNumber of direct dependencies: 3Monthly npm downloads

Signale is a highly customizable and extensible logging library for Node.js and browsers. It provides a simple and intuitive API for logging messages with different levels of severity, such as info, success, warn, and error. Signale allows you to add timestamps, colors, icons, and other formatting options to your log messages, making them more visually appealing and easier to read.

Alternatives:
winston+
pino+
log4js+
bunyan+
morgan+
consola+
debug+
winston-daily-rotate-file+
roarr+
nestjs-pino+

Tags: javascriptloggingnode.jsbrowsercustomizable

Fight!

Popularity

Both Bunyan and Signale are popular logging libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem. Bunyan has been around for longer and has a larger user base, while Signale has gained popularity for its simplicity and ease of use.

Features

Bunyan is a highly configurable logging library that provides structured logging with support for log levels, log streams, and log rotation. It is well-suited for complex logging scenarios and large-scale applications. Signale, on the other hand, focuses on providing a beautiful and customizable logging experience with support for log levels, colors, icons, and additional metadata.

Integration

Bunyan is primarily designed for server-side applications and integrates well with frameworks like Express and Hapi. It also has support for logging to various destinations such as files, streams, and external services. Signale, on the other hand, is more versatile and can be used in both server-side and client-side applications. It provides a simple and intuitive API for logging in any JavaScript environment.

Developer Experience

Bunyan has a more complex configuration and setup process compared to Signale. It requires defining loggers, serializers, and log streams. Signale, on the other hand, has a simpler and more straightforward API, making it easier to get started with logging. It also provides a beautiful and readable output format by default.

Customization

Both libraries offer customization options, but Signale provides more flexibility in terms of customizing log formats, colors, and icons. It allows developers to create their own loggers and extend the functionality as needed. Bunyan, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a structured logging experience with less emphasis on customization.

Community and Maintenance

Both Bunyan and Signale have active communities and are well-maintained. Bunyan has been around for a longer time and has a larger user base, which means it has a more mature ecosystem and extensive documentation. Signale, although relatively newer, has gained popularity and has a growing community with regular updates and improvements.