Bulma is a modern, open-source, and CSS-based design framework. It provides a set of widgets, utilities, and standardized styles that allow developers to quickly create responsive and user-friendly websites. Bulma emphasizes on mobile-first designs and provides a clean and consistent look-and-feel to your website. As it is built using CSS, developers have the freedom to use it with any front-end library or framework of their choice.
Windi CSS is a modern utility-first CSS framework that provides classes for designing pages quickly. It offers an intuitive syntax with over 250 built-in utilities for colors, typography, spacing, and more. The framework has a small footprint and can work independently or alongside other CSS frameworks.
Bulma has been around for longer and has a larger community and user base than WindiCSS. It is a well-established and widely used CSS framework in the web development community. WindiCSS, on the other hand, is a relatively newer framework but has gained popularity due to its modern and efficient approach to CSS.
Size
WindiCSS is known for its small bundle size. It achieves this by using on-demand class generation and tree-shaking techniques, only including the CSS that is actually used. Bulma, while not excessive, has a larger CSS footprint.
Customization
Bulma provides a more comprehensive set of pre-defined styles and components, making it easier to quickly build common UI layouts. It offers a wide range of customization options and Sass variables to tailor the framework to specific needs. WindiCSS takes a utility-first approach, providing a large number of utility classes that can be combined to create custom styles. It is highly customizable and allows for more granular control over the generated CSS.
Integration with frameworks
Both Bulma and WindiCSS can be used with different frontend frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular. Bulma has official integrations and extensions for popular frameworks, making it easier to use and integrate. WindiCSS can also be easily integrated with these frameworks, but may require some additional setup and configuration.
Developer experience
Bulma provides comprehensive documentation and has a well-defined set of components and layout options, making it easier for developers to get started. It also has a larger community support and various online resources available. WindiCSS offers a more modern and intuitive syntax, and its utility-first approach provides flexibility and speed in development. However, as a newer framework, it may have a smaller community and fewer learning resources compared to Bulma.
Compatibility
Bulma provides excellent browser compatibility and has been tested and optimized for a wide range of browsers. It ensures consistent styles and behavior across different platforms. WindiCSS also supports major browsers, but being a newer framework, it may require additional testing and debugging for specific edge cases.
