Head-to-Head: Bulma vs Tailwind CSS Analysis

bulma

v1.0.1(28 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Bulma is a modern CSS framework based on Flexbox that offers a clean and modular design for building responsive web interfaces. It provides a wide range of customizable components and utilities, making it easy to create visually appealing layouts without the need for additional JavaScript. Bulma's documentation is comprehensive and beginner-friendly, offering clear examples and guidelines for implementation.

Alternatives:
tailwindcss+
bootstrap+
foundation-sites+
tachyons+
skeleton+
milligram+
spectre.css+
uikit+
primer-css+
semantic-ui-css+

Tags: cssframeworkflexboxresponsivemodular

tailwindcss

v3.4.4(12 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 22Monthly npm downloads

Tailwind CSS is a utility-first CSS framework that provides a set of pre-built classes to style your web projects. It focuses on rapid development and customization by offering a low-level utility approach, allowing you to quickly style your components without writing custom CSS. Tailwind CSS is highly configurable, enabling you to create unique designs while maintaining consistency across your project.

Alternatives:
windicss+
tachyons+
bootstrap+
bulma+
foundation-sites+
semantic-ui-css+
skeleton+
materialize-css+
uikit+
primer-css+

Tags: cssframeworkutility-firstrapid-developmentcustomization

Fight!

Popularity

Both Bulma and Tailwind CSS are popular CSS frameworks, but Tailwind CSS has gained significant popularity in recent years. It has a large and active community, extensive documentation, and is widely adopted by developers.

Approach

Bulma focuses on providing a clean and easy-to-use CSS framework with a predefined set of components and styling. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, takes a utility-first approach, providing a comprehensive set of utility classes that can be composed to build custom designs.

Customization

Both frameworks offer customization options. Bulma provides a set of variables that can be modified to customize the styling. Tailwind CSS allows for extensive customization through its utility classes. It also provides a configuration file that allows developers to customize the classes and generate a tailored CSS file.

Size

In terms of size, Bulma is lightweight compared to Tailwind CSS. Bulma's CSS file has a smaller footprint compared to the larger CSS file generated by Tailwind CSS due to its utility class approach. However, Tailwind CSS allows for better optimization by purging unused classes, resulting in smaller production CSS files.

Learning Curve

Bulma has a simpler and more intuitive class naming convention, making it easier for beginners to get started. Tailwind CSS, with its extensive set of utility classes, has a steeper learning curve but offers more flexibility and customization options once mastered.

Integration with JavaScript Frameworks

Both Bulma and Tailwind CSS can be easily integrated with JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, or Angular. However, Bulma provides more prebuilt components and has better documentation for integration with popular JavaScript frameworks.

Community and Ecosystem

Tailwind CSS has a larger and more active community compared to Bulma. It has a vast ecosystem of extensions, plugins, and third-party integrations that can be leveraged to enhance development productivity.