Head-to-Head: Bulma vs Semantic UI Analysis

bulma

v1.0.1(28 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Bulma is a modern CSS framework based on Flexbox that offers a clean and modular design for building responsive web interfaces. It provides a wide range of customizable components and utilities, making it easy to create visually appealing layouts without the need for additional JavaScript. Bulma's documentation is comprehensive and beginner-friendly, offering clear examples and guidelines for implementation.

Alternatives:
tailwindcss+
bootstrap+
foundation-sites+
tachyons+
skeleton+
milligram+
spectre.css+
uikit+
primer-css+
semantic-ui-css+

Tags: cssframeworkflexboxresponsivemodular

semantic-ui

v2.5.0(over 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/semantic-uiNumber of direct dependencies: 33Monthly npm downloads

Semantic UI is a modern front-end development framework that provides a sleek and intuitive user interface design. It offers a wide range of UI components, such as buttons, forms, grids, and modals, with a focus on responsive design and accessibility. Semantic UI's modular structure allows for easy customization and theming, making it suitable for creating visually appealing and user-friendly web applications.

Alternatives:
fomantic-ui+
ant-design+
material-ui+
blueprintjs+
primevue+
chakra-ui+
react-bootstrap+
bulma+
tailwindcss+
foundation-sites+

Tags: front-endUI frameworkresponsive designaccessibilitycustomization

Fight!

Popularity

Both Bulma and Semantic UI are popular CSS frameworks, but Bulma has gained significant popularity in recent years. It has a large and active community, and many developers prefer its lightweight and flexible approach.

Design and Styling

Bulma focuses on simplicity, minimalism, and a modern design aesthetic. It provides a set of responsive and mobile-first components that are easy to customize. Semantic UI, on the other hand, offers a more opinionated and visually distinctive design, with a greater emphasis on providing out-of-the-box theming options.

Size and Performance

Bulma is relatively lightweight compared to Semantic UI. It allows developers to pick and choose only the components they need, resulting in smaller bundle sizes. Semantic UI, while more feature-rich, has a larger footprint. In terms of performance, Bulma tends to perform better due to its simplicity and smaller size.

Flexibility and Customization

Bulma provides an easy-to-understand and customizable CSS framework that allows developers to modify the default styles and customize the design to fit their needs. Semantic UI offers a greater level of customization options and a theming system that allows for extensive control over the visual styling.

Documentation and Community Support

Both Bulma and Semantic UI have well-documented APIs and provide comprehensive documentation. Bulma's documentation is straightforward and beginner-friendly, while Semantic UI's documentation is more extensive and includes interactive examples and tutorials. Both frameworks have active communities that provide support and resources.

Integration with JavaScript Frameworks

Both frameworks can be easily integrated into different JavaScript frameworks/libraries. Bulma provides a more lightweight and framework-agnostic approach, suitable for various projects. Semantic UI, on the other hand, has specific integration packages for popular frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue.js, providing additional pre-built components and functionality.