Head-to-Head: Bulma vs Pure.css Analysis

bulma

v1.0.2(4 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Bulma is a modern CSS framework based on Flexbox that offers a clean and modular design for building responsive web interfaces. It provides a wide range of customizable components and utilities, making it easy to create visually appealing layouts with minimal effort. Bulma's documentation is comprehensive and beginner-friendly, offering clear examples and guidelines for implementation.

Alternatives:
bootstrap+
tailwindcss+
foundation-sites+
materialize-css+
semantic-ui+
uikit+
spectre.css+
tailwind-styled-components+
primer-css+
purecss+

Tags: cssframeworkflexboxresponsivemodular

purecss

v3.0.0(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

PureCSS is a lightweight set of responsive CSS modules that can be used to quickly and easily create clean and minimalistic web designs. It provides a grid system, typography styles, forms, buttons, tables, and other essential components for building modern websites. PureCSS is known for its simplicity and flexibility, allowing developers to customize and extend the styles to fit their design needs.

Alternatives:
bulma+
tailwindcss+
bootstrap+
foundation-sites+
materialize-css+
semantic-ui-css+
uikit+
spectre.css+
milligram+
skeleton+

Tags: cssresponsiveminimalisticgrid-systemweb-design

Fight!

Popularity

Both Bulma and PureCSS are popular CSS frameworks, but Bulma has gained more popularity in recent years. It has a larger community, more active development, and a wider adoption among developers.

Size

PureCSS is a lightweight framework with a smaller file size compared to Bulma. It focuses on minimalism and provides a basic set of CSS styles and components. Bulma, on the other hand, offers a more extensive set of features and styles, which results in a larger file size.

Customization

Both frameworks allow customization, but Bulma offers more flexibility and customization options out of the box. It provides a wide range of pre-built components, themes, and modifiers that can be easily customized using Sass variables. PureCSS, although less customizable, offers a simpler and more opinionated approach.

Component Ecosystem

Bulma has a robust component ecosystem with a wide variety of ready-to-use components like modals, tabs, and navigation bars. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that can be easily integrated into projects. PureCSS, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a foundation of minimal styles and leaves the creation of custom components to the developer.

Flexibility

PureCSS promotes a more minimalist and flexible approach by providing a basic starting point for styling, allowing developers to build upon it based on their specific needs. Bulma, while still flexible, provides more comprehensive styling and component options out of the box, which can be beneficial for rapidly prototyping or building projects with less custom styling requirements.

Community and Documentation

Both Bulma and PureCSS have active communities, but Bulma has a larger and more engaged community. It offers extensive documentation, examples, and resources that make it easier for developers to learn and use the framework. PureCSS has documentation available, but it is relatively more limited compared to Bulma.