Bulma is a modern CSS framework based on Flexbox that offers a clean and modular design for building responsive web interfaces. It provides a wide range of customizable components and utilities, making it easy to create visually appealing layouts with minimal effort. Bulma's documentation is comprehensive and beginner-friendly, offering clear examples and guidelines for implementation.
Alternatives:
bootstrap-+
tailwindcss-+
foundation-sites-+
materialize-css-+
semantic-ui-+
uikit-+
spectre.css-+
tailwind-styled-components-+
primer-css-+
purecss-+
Tags: cssframeworkflexboxresponsivemodular
foundation-sites
v6.9.0(about 2 months ago)
Foundation Sites is a responsive front-end framework that provides a robust set of tools and components for building modern websites and web applications. It offers a grid system, responsive navigation, UI elements, and JavaScript plugins to streamline development and ensure a consistent user experience across devices.
Alternatives:
bootstrap-+
bulma-+
tailwindcss-+
materialize-css-+
semantic-ui-+
uikit-+
spectre.css-+
purecss-+
milligram-+
skeleton-+
Tags: front-endframeworkresponsiveUIcomponents
Fight!
Popularity
Both Bulma and Foundation Sites are popular CSS frameworks that have gained a significant following in the web development community. Bulma is known for its simplicity and ease of use, while Foundation Sites offers a robust set of features and customization options.
Size
Bulma is a lightweight CSS framework, with a file size of around 230 KB. Foundation Sites, on the other hand, is a more feature-rich framework, which results in a larger file size of approximately 750 KB. If file size is a concern, Bulma may be a more suitable choice.
Customization
Both frameworks are highly customizable, but Foundation Sites provides more extensive customization options. It offers a comprehensive Sass-based architecture that allows developers to selectively include or exclude components and modify the framework's styles easily. Bulma is also customizable, but it has a more opinionated design and relies on CSS variables for customization.
Documentation
Both frameworks have well-documented websites that provide comprehensive guides, examples, and documentation for developers. Bulma's documentation is considered to be straightforward and easy to follow, with a focus on simplicity. Foundation Sites also has good documentation but is more extensive due to its larger feature set.
Browser Support
Both Bulma and Foundation Sites have excellent browser support. They are designed to be responsive and work well across different devices and browsers. Foundation Sites, being a more mature framework, may have slightly better browser support and a more thorough testing process.
Community and Ecosystem
Both frameworks have active communities and ecosystems surrounding them. Bulma has a growing community with a variety of third-party themes and extensions available. Foundation Sites has a larger community and a more established ecosystem with plugins, templates, and integrations with popular tools and frameworks.
