Head-to-Head: Bootstrap vs MaterializeCSS Analysis
v5.3.3(10 days ago)
v1.0.0(over 5 years ago)
Bootstrap has been a popular and widely-used CSS framework for a long time, with a large user base and community support. Materialize CSS, while less popular than Bootstrap, has also gained popularity and has a dedicated user base. Both packages have active communities and provide regular updates.
Design and Styling
Bootstrap provides a clean and modern design with a focus on simplicity and consistency. It offers a variety of pre-designed components, such as buttons, cards, and navigation bars, along with a customizable grid system. Materialize CSS, on the other hand, follows the Material Design principles with a more vibrant and colorful aesthetic. It also includes a wide range of components and animations that align with Material Design guidelines.
Bootstrap offers extensive customization options through its SASS variables, allowing developers to easily modify aspects like colors, spacing, and breakpoints to match their project's branding. Materialize CSS also provides customization options through SASS variables, but its design is more opinionated and may require additional effort to customize extensively.
Bootstrap has excellent documentation with detailed examples, code snippets, and explanations. It also provides a wide range of official themes and templates. Materialize CSS documentation is also comprehensive, but it may not be as extensive or widely-used as Bootstrap's documentation.
Bootstrap has a large community and is widely used, so finding resources, tutorials, and support is relatively easy. Materialize CSS, while less popular, still has an active community and provides support through forums and GitHub issues.