Head-to-Head: Bootstrap vs MaterializeCSS Analysis

bootstrap

v5.3.3(10 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/bootstrapNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Bootstrap is a popular front-end framework for building responsive and mobile-first websites and web applications. It provides a collection of CSS and JavaScript components that can be easily customized and used to create modern and visually appealing user interfaces. With Bootstrap, developers can quickly prototype and build responsive layouts, navigation menus, forms, buttons, and much more.

Alternatives:
bulma+
foundation-sites+
semantic-ui-css+
uikit+
tailwindcss+
materialize-css+
spectre.css+
tachyons+
primer-css+
purecss+

Tags: javascriptcssfront-endresponsiveframework

materialize-css

v1.0.0(over 5 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/materialize-cssNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Materialize CSS is a modern and responsive front-end framework based on Google's Material Design guidelines. It provides a comprehensive set of CSS and JavaScript components that make it easy to create visually appealing and interactive web applications. With Materialize CSS, you can quickly build responsive layouts, navigation bars, forms, buttons, cards, and much more.

Alternatives:
material-ui+
@mui/material+
react-materialize+
material-components-web+
materialize+
vue-material+
vuetify+
mdbootstrap+
quasar+
material-components-web-react+

Tags: cssframeworkresponsivematerial-designfront-end

Fight!

Popularity

Bootstrap has been a popular and widely-used CSS framework for a long time, with a large user base and community support. Materialize CSS, while less popular than Bootstrap, has also gained popularity and has a dedicated user base. Both packages have active communities and provide regular updates.

Design and Styling

Bootstrap provides a clean and modern design with a focus on simplicity and consistency. It offers a variety of pre-designed components, such as buttons, cards, and navigation bars, along with a customizable grid system. Materialize CSS, on the other hand, follows the Material Design principles with a more vibrant and colorful aesthetic. It also includes a wide range of components and animations that align with Material Design guidelines.

Customization

Bootstrap offers extensive customization options through its SASS variables, allowing developers to easily modify aspects like colors, spacing, and breakpoints to match their project's branding. Materialize CSS also provides customization options through SASS variables, but its design is more opinionated and may require additional effort to customize extensively.

Compatibility

Both Bootstrap and Materialize CSS are compatible with modern browsers and mobile devices. However, Bootstrap has better browser support and offers more consistent behavior across different browsers compared to Materialize CSS. Materialize CSS may require some additional CSS and JavaScript tweaks for optimal performance in older browsers.

Documentation

Bootstrap has excellent documentation with detailed examples, code snippets, and explanations. It also provides a wide range of official themes and templates. Materialize CSS documentation is also comprehensive, but it may not be as extensive or widely-used as Bootstrap's documentation.

Integration

Both frameworks can be easily integrated with popular JavaScript libraries like React, Vue.js, or Angular. They provide separate packages and guidelines for integration with these frameworks, making it convenient for developers to use them in their projects.

Community Support

Bootstrap has a large community and is widely used, so finding resources, tutorials, and support is relatively easy. Materialize CSS, while less popular, still has an active community and provides support through forums and GitHub issues.