Head-to-Head: Backbone (deprecated) vs Ember Analysis

backbone.marionette

v4.1.3(over 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/backbone.marionetteNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Backbone.Marionette is a composite application library for Backbone.js that simplifies the development of complex web applications. It provides a set of robust components and tools to help structure your Backbone application, including views, layouts, regions, and more. Marionette promotes best practices and design patterns like modularity, separation of concerns, and event-driven architecture.

Alternatives:
vue+
react+
angular+
ember-source+
stimulus+
alpinejs+
mithril+
svelte+
riot+
petite-vue+

Tags: javascriptbackbone.jscomposite applicationweb applicationsdesign patterns

ember-source

v5.9.0(17 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 47Monthly npm downloads

Ember Source is the core library of the Ember.js framework, providing a robust set of tools and conventions for building ambitious web applications. It offers features like two-way data binding, computed properties, routing, and a strong focus on developer ergonomics. Ember Source follows the convention over configuration principle, making it easy to get started with structured and scalable applications.

Alternatives:
vue+
react+
angular+
svelte+
preact+
lit+
stimulus+
alpinejs+
mithril+
marionette+

Tags: javascriptframeworkweb applicationsdata bindingrouting

Fight!

Popularity

Both Backbone.Marionette and Ember.js are popular JavaScript frameworks, but Ember.js (ember-source) has a larger community and is more widely adopted. It has been around for longer and has a strong following in the web development community.

Architecture

Backbone.Marionette is a lightweight framework that builds on top of Backbone.js, providing additional abstractions and features to simplify the development of complex applications. Ember.js, on the other hand, is a full-featured framework that follows the convention-over-configuration principle and provides a complete solution for building ambitious web applications.

Learning Curve

Backbone.Marionette has a relatively low learning curve, especially if you are already familiar with Backbone.js. It provides a set of opinionated abstractions that make it easier to structure and organize your code. Ember.js, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive nature and convention-based approach. It requires learning Ember's specific concepts and conventions.

Developer Experience

Ember.js provides a more integrated and opinionated development experience. It has a powerful CLI tool that automates many common tasks and enforces best practices. It also has a rich ecosystem of addons and a well-defined architecture. Backbone.Marionette, while providing useful abstractions, may require more manual configuration and setup.

Scalability

Ember.js is designed for building large-scale applications and provides built-in solutions for managing state, routing, and data persistence. It has a strong convention-based approach that promotes consistency and scalability. Backbone.Marionette, while suitable for smaller to medium-sized applications, may require more manual effort to handle complex application structures and state management.

Community and Ecosystem

Ember.js has a larger and more active community, which means more resources, tutorials, and community support. It also has a rich ecosystem of addons and plugins that extend its functionality. Backbone.Marionette has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison, but it still has a dedicated user base and a set of plugins available.