Head-to-Head: Backbone (deprecated) vs Ember Analysis

backbone.marionette

v4.1.3(over 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/backbone.marionetteNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Backbone.Marionette is a framework built on top of Backbone.js that simplifies the development of complex JavaScript applications. It provides a set of abstractions and utilities to help organize and structure your code, making it easier to build scalable and maintainable applications.

Alternatives:
vue+
react+
angular+
ember+
stimulus+
alpinejs+
mithril+
svelte+
riot+
inferno+

Tags: javascriptframeworkbackboneapplicationviews

ember-source

v5.6.0(about 1 month ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 47Monthly npm downloads

Ember Source is the core package of the Ember.js framework, a powerful JavaScript framework for building ambitious web applications. It provides a complete set of tools and conventions for creating scalable and maintainable applications. Ember Source includes features like two-way data binding, computed properties, routing, and a powerful templating system.

Alternatives:
vue+
angular+
react+
svelte+
preact+
backbone+
marionette+
stimulus+
mithril+
alpinejs+

Tags: javascriptframeworkwebambitious-applicationstwo-way-data-bindingroutingtemplating

Fight!

Popularity

Both Backbone.Marionette and Ember.js are popular JavaScript frameworks, but Ember.js (ember-source) has a larger community and is more widely adopted. It has been around for longer and has a strong following in the web development community.

Architecture

Backbone.Marionette is a lightweight framework that builds on top of Backbone.js, providing additional abstractions and features to simplify the development of complex applications. Ember.js, on the other hand, is a full-featured framework that follows the convention-over-configuration principle and provides a complete solution for building ambitious web applications.

Learning Curve

Backbone.Marionette has a relatively low learning curve, especially if you are already familiar with Backbone.js. It provides a set of opinionated abstractions that make it easier to structure and organize your code. Ember.js, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive nature and convention-based approach. It requires learning Ember's specific concepts and conventions.

Developer Experience

Ember.js provides a more integrated and opinionated development experience. It has a powerful CLI tool that automates many common tasks and enforces best practices. It also has a rich ecosystem of addons and a well-defined architecture. Backbone.Marionette, while providing useful abstractions, may require more manual configuration and setup.

Scalability

Ember.js is designed for building large-scale applications and provides built-in solutions for managing state, routing, and data persistence. It has a strong convention-based approach that promotes consistency and scalability. Backbone.Marionette, while suitable for smaller to medium-sized applications, may require more manual effort to handle complex application structures and state management.

Community and Ecosystem

Ember.js has a larger and more active community, which means more resources, tutorials, and community support. It also has a rich ecosystem of addons and plugins that extend its functionality. Backbone.Marionette has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison, but it still has a dedicated user base and a set of plugins available.