Head-to-Head: Backbone (deprecated) vs Ember Analysis
v4.1.3(over 3 years ago)
v5.6.0(about 1 month ago)
Backbone.Marionette is a lightweight framework that builds on top of Backbone.js, providing additional abstractions and features to simplify the development of complex applications. Ember.js, on the other hand, is a full-featured framework that follows the convention-over-configuration principle and provides a complete solution for building ambitious web applications.
Backbone.Marionette has a relatively low learning curve, especially if you are already familiar with Backbone.js. It provides a set of opinionated abstractions that make it easier to structure and organize your code. Ember.js, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive nature and convention-based approach. It requires learning Ember's specific concepts and conventions.
Ember.js provides a more integrated and opinionated development experience. It has a powerful CLI tool that automates many common tasks and enforces best practices. It also has a rich ecosystem of addons and a well-defined architecture. Backbone.Marionette, while providing useful abstractions, may require more manual configuration and setup.
Ember.js is designed for building large-scale applications and provides built-in solutions for managing state, routing, and data persistence. It has a strong convention-based approach that promotes consistency and scalability. Backbone.Marionette, while suitable for smaller to medium-sized applications, may require more manual effort to handle complex application structures and state management.
Community and Ecosystem
Ember.js has a larger and more active community, which means more resources, tutorials, and community support. It also has a rich ecosystem of addons and plugins that extend its functionality. Backbone.Marionette has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison, but it still has a dedicated user base and a set of plugins available.