Head-to-Head: Ava vs Jasmine Analysis

ava

v6.1.2(6 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 40Monthly npm downloads

AVA is a powerful and flexible JavaScript testing framework that focuses on simplicity and performance. It provides a concise and expressive syntax for writing tests, making it easy to create and maintain test suites. AVA runs tests concurrently, taking full advantage of modern multi-core processors, resulting in faster test execution times.

Alternatives:
jest+
mocha+
chai+
jasmine+
tape+
qunit+
vitest+
jest-circus+
cypress+
playwright-test+

Tags: javascripttestingframeworkconcurrentperformance

jasmine-core

v5.1.2(26 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Jasmine Core is a JavaScript testing framework that provides a clean and intuitive syntax for writing tests. It is designed to be easy to set up and use, making it a popular choice for testing JavaScript applications and libraries. With Jasmine Core, you can write test suites, define test cases, and assert expected outcomes with a wide range of built-in matchers.

Alternatives:
mocha+
jest+
chai+
ava+
tape+
qunit+
jest-circus+
karma+
cypress+
vitest+

Tags: javascripttestingframeworksyntaxmatchers

Fight!

Popularity

Both Ava and Jasmine have a significant user base and are widely used in the JavaScript community. Jasmine has been around for longer and has established a strong presence, while Ava has gained popularity in recent years due to its async testing capabilities.

Testing Style

Jasmine follows a Behavior Driven Development (BDD) testing style, providing a more expressive syntax for test cases. Ava, on the other hand, adopts a more minimalist and straightforward approach to testing.

Syntax

Jasmine uses a declarative syntax with functions such as 'describe', 'it', and 'expect' to structure test suites and assertions. Ava uses ES2017 async/await syntax for writing test cases, making it easier to handle asynchronous code.

Concurrency

Ava is known for its concurrent test execution, which allows test cases to run in parallel by default, resulting in faster test execution times. Jasmine runs tests serially and does not have built-in support for parallel execution.

Configuration

Jasmine is easy to set up and configure with minimal configuration required. Ava is also easy to configure, but it offers more customization options such as configuring test retries, environment variables, and parallel test settings.

Integration

Both Ava and Jasmine can be integrated with various build tools and frameworks. However, Jasmine has stronger integration with popular JavaScript frameworks like Angular, while Ava is more flexible and can be easily integrated into different environments and testing frameworks.

Community and Ecosystem

Jasmine has a larger community and a well-established ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and extensions available. Ava has a smaller but growing community, and its ecosystem is expanding with new plugins being developed.

Documentation

Both Ava and Jasmine have comprehensive documentation, but Jasmine's documentation is more extensive and covers a wider range of topics, making it easier to learn and troubleshoot. Ava's documentation is concise but provides enough information to get started quickly.