Head-to-Head: Aurelia vs Mithril.js Analysis

aurelia-framework

v1.4.1(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 9Monthly npm downloads

Aurelia Framework is a powerful and flexible JavaScript framework for building web and mobile applications. It follows a modular and unobtrusive design philosophy, allowing developers to create highly maintainable and scalable applications. Aurelia offers a two-way data binding system, dependency injection, routing, and templating capabilities, making it easy to build complex single-page applications.

Alternatives:
angular+
ember-source+
stimulus+
marionette+
backbone+
alpinejs+
mithril+
vue+
preact+
svelte+

Tags: javascriptframeworkwebmobiledata-bindingrouting

mithril

v2.2.2(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/mithrilNumber of direct dependencies: 1Monthly npm downloads

Mithril is a modern client-side JavaScript framework for building single-page applications. It is known for its small size (only 8kb gzipped) and high performance, making it a great choice for lightweight applications where speed and efficiency are crucial. Mithril follows a minimalist design philosophy, providing a simple and elegant API for creating components, managing state, and handling routing.

Alternatives:
preact+
vue+
react+
svelte+
inferno+
alpinejs+
solid-js+
hyperapp+
lit+
riot+

Tags: javascriptframeworksingle-page-applicationlightweighthigh-performance

Fight!

Popularity

Mithril has gained popularity for its simplicity and performance, especially in smaller projects and single-page applications. Aurelia, on the other hand, is a more comprehensive framework with a larger ecosystem and community support.

Architecture

Aurelia follows a convention over configuration approach, providing a more opinionated structure for building applications. Mithril, on the other hand, is minimalist and allows for more flexibility in how applications are structured.

Performance

Mithril is known for its exceptional performance due to its small size and efficient virtual DOM implementation. Aurelia, while performant, may have slightly more overhead due to its larger feature set and architecture.

Learning Curve

Mithril is praised for its simplicity and ease of learning, making it a great choice for developers looking for a lightweight framework with minimal abstraction. Aurelia, with its more comprehensive feature set, may have a steeper learning curve but offers more out-of-the-box functionality.

Community and Ecosystem

Aurelia has a larger community and ecosystem with more plugins, tools, and resources available. Mithril, while smaller in comparison, has an active and dedicated community that continues to support and improve the framework.