Head-to-Head: Aurelia vs Ember Analysis

aurelia-framework

v1.4.1(about 2 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 9Monthly npm downloads

Aurelia Framework is a powerful and flexible JavaScript framework for building web and mobile applications. It follows a modular and unobtrusive design philosophy, allowing developers to create highly maintainable and scalable applications. Aurelia offers a two-way data binding system, dependency injection, routing, and templating capabilities, making it easy to build complex single-page applications.

Alternatives:
angular+
ember-source+
stimulus+
marionette+
backbone+
alpinejs+
mithril+
vue+
preact+
svelte+

Tags: javascriptframeworkwebmobiledata-bindingrouting

ember-source

v5.9.0(17 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 47Monthly npm downloads

Ember Source is the core library of the Ember.js framework, providing a robust set of tools and conventions for building ambitious web applications. It offers features like two-way data binding, computed properties, routing, and a strong focus on developer ergonomics. Ember Source follows the convention over configuration principle, making it easy to get started with structured and scalable applications.

Alternatives:
vue+
react+
angular+
svelte+
preact+
lit+
stimulus+
alpinejs+
mithril+
marionette+

Tags: javascriptframeworkweb applicationsdata bindingrouting

Fight!

Popularity

Ember.js has been around for longer and has a larger community and user base compared to Aurelia. Ember.js is widely used in large-scale applications and has a strong following in the JavaScript community. Aurelia, although less popular, still has a dedicated user base and active community support.

Scalability

Both Aurelia and Ember.js are designed to handle large-scale applications. Ember.js provides a more opinionated framework with built-in conventions and a powerful CLI, making it easier to scale and maintain complex projects. Aurelia, on the other hand, offers more flexibility and allows developers to choose their preferred architecture and tools.

Performance

Ember.js has a strong focus on performance optimization and provides features like Glimmer rendering engine and FastBoot for server-side rendering. Aurelia also performs well, but it may require more manual optimization for performance-critical scenarios.

Developer Experience

Ember.js provides a comprehensive set of tools, including a powerful CLI, Ember Inspector, and a rich ecosystem of addons. It has a steep learning curve but offers a consistent and productive development experience once mastered. Aurelia aims for simplicity and ease of use, providing a straightforward API and a modular architecture that allows developers to choose their preferred tools and libraries.

Learning Curve

Ember.js has a steeper learning curve due to its opinionated nature and the need to understand its conventions. Aurelia, on the other hand, has a shallower learning curve and is easier to get started with, especially for developers familiar with modern JavaScript frameworks.

Community and Support

Ember.js has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It also has a strong support system and regular updates from the core team. Aurelia has a smaller community but still provides active support through its forums, documentation, and community-driven resources.