Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs Tachyons Analysis


v1.2.0(7 months ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS library for React. It allows you to write CSS styles in JavaScript using a familiar CSS syntax, and then generates optimized CSS at build time. This eliminates the need for runtime CSS processing and improves performance.

Alternatives: styled-components, emotion, linaria

Tags: javascriptcss-in-jsreactstylingperformance


v4.12.0(over 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Tachyons is a functional CSS framework that enables rapid and consistent development of responsive user interfaces in an efficient and maintainable way. It is built around the concept of atomic design, providing a library of small, single-purpose classes that can be easily composed to build complex components.

Alternatives: Bootstrap, Foundation, Bulma

Tags: cssframeworkresponsive-designatomic-designfast-loading-time



Both Astroturf and Tachyons are popular npm packages in the front-end development community. However, Tachyons has been around for longer and has a larger community and user base compared to Astroturf.

Usage and Purpose

Astroturf is a CSS-in-JS library that aims to provide a seamless and efficient way to write and manage CSS styles in JavaScript components. It offers a zero-runtime solution and supports a range of CSS features. On the other hand, Tachyons is a CSS toolkit designed to create fast, scalable, and responsive interfaces. It provides a set of predefined CSS classes that can be easily used to style components.

Developer Experience

Astroturf provides a developer-friendly experience with a familiar CSS syntax and comprehensive type checking. It integrates well with popular frameworks like React, Next.js, and Gatsby. Tachyons also offers a pleasant development experience with its highly modular and reusable CSS classes. It enables rapid prototyping and provides consistency across projects with a consistent design system.


Astroturf allows for more customization as CSS styles are written directly in JavaScript components. This enables dynamic styling based on component props and offers more fine-grained control over styles. Tachyons, on the other hand, provides a predefined set of CSS classes which may limit customizability but ensures consistency and reusability.


As Astroturf compiles CSS styles into static class names at build-time, it offers optimized performance with minimal runtime overhead. Tachyons also focuses on performance by keeping the stylesheets small and providing a scalable CSS architecture. Both packages prioritize efficiency and performance.

Community and Support

Tachyons has a larger and more mature community with a wealth of resources, documentation, and community-contributed components. Astroturf, while not as widely adopted, has an active community and provides good documentation and support.