Head-to-Head: Astroturf vs Tachyons Analysis

astroturf

v1.2.0(about 1 year ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are bundled with the npm packageNumber of direct dependencies: 26Monthly npm downloads

Astroturf is a zero-runtime CSS-in-JS solution for styling React components. It allows developers to write CSS directly in JavaScript using familiar CSS syntax, which is then transformed into efficient, scoped CSS at build time. Astroturf provides a seamless integration with React components, enabling the use of dynamic styles, theming, and CSS variables.

Alternatives:
styled-components+
emotion+
linaria+
goober+
stitches+
styletron+
jss+
aphrodite+
glamorous+
radium+

Tags: javascriptreactcss-in-jsstylingbuild-time

tachyons

v4.12.0(about 4 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.The package doesn't have any types definitionsNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Tachyons is a functional CSS framework that focuses on creating fast, responsive, and scalable user interfaces. It provides a set of atomic CSS classes that can be easily combined to style elements without writing custom CSS. Tachyons promotes a mobile-first approach and encourages a modular design system, allowing for quick prototyping and consistent styling across projects.

Alternatives:
tailwindcss+
bulma+
bootstrap+
foundation-sites+
skeleton+
milligram+
spectre.css+
purecss+
picnic+
primer-css+

Tags: cssframeworkresponsiveatomic-classesmodular

Fight!

Styling Approach

Astroturf is a CSS-in-JS solution that allows you to write CSS directly in your JavaScript files using a CSS-like syntax. It offers scoped styles and various CSS features. Tachyons, on the other hand, is a functional CSS framework that provides a set of utility classes to style elements. It focuses on single-purpose utility classes for rapid development.

Flexibility

Astroturf provides more flexibility in terms of writing and organizing styles within your JavaScript files. It allows for dynamic styling and theming. Tachyons, on the other hand, offers a predefined set of utility classes that can be applied directly to elements, providing a more opinionated and consistent styling approach.

Performance

Astroturf generates static CSS files at build time, which can improve performance by reducing runtime CSS processing. Tachyons, being a functional CSS framework, relies on a large number of utility classes, which can sometimes lead to larger CSS file sizes. However, Tachyons' approach of using single-purpose classes can also result in more optimized and efficient styling.

Learning Curve

Astroturf may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with CSS-in-JS solutions or prefer to keep styles separate from components. Tachyons, with its utility classes approach, can be easier to pick up and use quickly, especially for developers who prefer a more declarative and functional style of styling.

Community and Support

Astroturf has a smaller but active community that is dedicated to maintaining and improving the library. Tachyons, being a popular functional CSS framework, has a larger community and more resources available, including themes and extensions created by the community.